| Line 176: |
Line 176: |
| | | | |
| | == Two new essays dealing with the future of the homosexual agenda in the USA, UK and the Western World == | | == Two new essays dealing with the future of the homosexual agenda in the USA, UK and the Western World == |
| − | [[File:I'm teachers pet.PNG|left|250px|thumb|"Mommy Mommy! Look at me!"]]
| + | |
| | I created two essays dealing with the future of the homosexual agenda in the USA, UK and the Western World which are given below: | | I created two essays dealing with the future of the homosexual agenda in the USA, UK and the Western World which are given below: |
| | | | |
| Line 187: |
Line 187: |
| | | | |
| | '''Attention all Western gay activists:''' Say goodbye to your precious and very fleeting gayness in the Western World! Anti-homosexuality sentiments and Jesus are coming! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:07, December 8, 2023 (EST) | | '''Attention all Western gay activists:''' Say goodbye to your precious and very fleeting gayness in the Western World! Anti-homosexuality sentiments and Jesus are coming! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:07, December 8, 2023 (EST) |
| − |
| |
| − | :Quit spamming Andy's talk page. That is not an example for an Admin to set. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 01:40, December 9, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::Andy's #1 issue is the [[homosexual agenda]]. When I talked to him on the phone he was happy that I created the recent homosexuality articles/essays.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::If Andy wants to appoint you as a spokesperson as far as his talk page, I am sure that he will let you know should that day arise. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:16, December 9, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::Use your head. What happens when every registered user wants to post up their latest drivel here and say, "Mommy Mommy! Look at me!" Andy's got his hands full with enough responsibilities.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::An Admin's job is to help relieve Andy of the trivial bs in running a website, not add to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 02:20, December 9, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::User:Conservative should open his talk page to normal discussion so that Andy isn't bothered by all this [[trolling]] [[gossip]] on his user talk page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 13:57, December 11, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | RobSmith, in interviews Andy publicly has touted my homosexuality content and other content at Conservapedia. I can't recall any public interview where he touted your content.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Futhermore, you childishly changed my short bio at [[Conservapedia]] to be a smear.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | It's obvious that you are engaging in petty jealousy. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:24, December 11, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Oh, you are referring to [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&diff=1966652&oldid=1930020 this edit], ''"User:Conservative account argues for [[unipolarity|unipolarism]] and [[American exceptionalism]], that one can be a [[social conservative]] and [[neoconservative]] at the same time."''' Maybe if your talk page had been open to normal discussion, you wouldn't have problems defending such positions.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :And maybe I'm not in it for myself, for self-aggrandizement; maybe I like flying beneath the radar to accomplish tasks:
| |
| − | {{Cquote|'''''Where is boasting then? It is excluded.''' By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.'' [bolden added]|||Romans 3:27}}
| |
| − | :: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 14:47, December 11, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Bottomline: You have touted the pro-Biden neocon agenda for 2 years, misinforming [[conservative]] readers. And you have severely disrupted [[war]] reporting, which was difficult enough due to [[liberal censorship]] and translating from other languages - with your daily, incessant, hours-long trolling.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :And you have admitted you were motivated by a personal grudge cause you got your feelings and ego hurt, not by any knowledge or interest in [[geopolitics]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 15:15, December 11, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::Let me know when you are done with your unsupported allegations and actually have something substantive to say. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:46, December 11, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | :::Exhibit 1:
| |
| − | [[File:Admits to creating pages out of animosity to other editors.PNG|1240px]]
| |
| − | :::Exhibit 2:
| |
| − | :::[[User:Conservative: Was April 2022 a pivotal point in geopolitics that will affect geopolitics for 30 years or was it a failed prediction concerning the war in Ukraine?]]
| |
| − | :::Exhibit 3:
| |
| − | :::[[Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]]
| |
| − | :::There's plenty more. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 16:29, December 11, 2023 (EST
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::Bottomline: User:Conservative refuses (or more accurately, probably doesn't know how) to engage in civil discussion on talk pages, and prefers to misuse the Conservapedia platform to attack his "enemies" in user, Mainspace, and Essay space. To the extent he attempts to engage in "civil discussion" (when he's not crying to "Mommy") on talk pages, it is a rather lame attempt to pantomime [[trolling]] techniques he learned from being the victim of Ratvandals, salted with his own cut n spam from article and Essay space. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 16:42, December 11, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::If you you engage in incivility and belligerent behavior on main page talk in political discussions, it makes perfect sense to create essays instead.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::And there are plenty of reasons why most people consider February 2020 to be a pivotal point in politics and not April 2020. Statistically based on previous wars, "Of wars that last over a month but less than a year, only 24 percent end in a ceasefire. When interstate wars last longer than a year, they extend to over a decade on average, resulting in sporadic clashes."[https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-does-it-end-what-past-wars-tell-us-about-how-save-ukraine#:~:text=Wars%20that%20end%20within%20a,average%2C%20resulting%20in%20sporadic%20clashes.] Putin's invasion of Ukraine was on Feb 24, 2020 and once it went behind March 24, 2020, there was about a 76% chance that it would not quickly end in a ceasefire based on previous wars (Plus, Putin/Russia was engaging in war crimes during the negotiations).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::Most modern wars are based on miscalculations. Russia, which has a demographic crisis, was foolish to risk a war of attrition in Ukraine. Because wars of attrition, make a demographic crisis worse. See: [https://jamestown.org/program/russias-demographic-decline-will-be-deeper-last-longer-and-hurt-more-than-expected/ Russia’s Demographic Decline Will Be Deeper, Last Longer, and Hurt More Than Expected], 2023
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::Just because you are ignorant when it comes to the political science of wars in terms of how long they last under certain conditions, doesn't mean that everyone is.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::Unlike you, I prefer not to engage in wishful thinking and wishcasting. I prefer facts and realistic thinking. You may wish April 2020 was a pivotal month in history, but that doesn't make it so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:44, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::Very informative video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnSmrdoGS_k How bad is Russia's Demographic Crisis ? 🇷🇺]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:29, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::::Ever since ''[[Obergefell]]'', the [[State Department]] [[blackmail]]s and threatens with sanctions as "human rights violators" nations that do not legalize [[homosexuality]] and [[gay marriage]]. For some reason you leave that out of your "patriotic" [[neocon]] screeds. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 08:17, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | {{warning collapse|reason=non-responsive|content=Russia was under godless Soviet Union rule for about 70 years and the tragic result was that its society became more secularized. That is why its abortion, divorce, fertility, alcholism and church attendance rates are among the worst in the world. The former Soviet satellite nations have terrible fertility rates as well. This is why I am so bearish on the future of Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:31, December 12, 2023 (EST)}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::::Your [[Essay: The United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future]], is advocacy for a global [[homosexual agenda]] and [[gay marriage]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 08:30, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::::Show me in the essay via quotes where the essay promotes the homosexual agenda. You can't do it! If you could you certainly would do so. It's another case of shameful lying on your part. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::::::You ignore the global backlash against American promotion of [[gay rights]]. You promote both the [[neocon]] and [[homosexual agenda]] with that Essay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 08:38, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::::::You are mistaken. I doubt you even read the essay and are whining about an essay that you haven't read.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::::::The essay says about the USA's weaknesses: "It is a divided nation. A large part of the population is very individualistic/[[narcissism|narcissistic]]/selfish with some immoral/uncivilized/wacky/impractical ideas (For example, [[Homosexual agenda]], pro-[[abortion]], pro-[[feminism]], [[liberal values]], [[Atheism and morality|secular values]], etc.). In addition, there are U.S. government employees/departments trying to influence other countries to adopt these values through incentives and/or withholding of aid. On a more positive side, it looks like the USA is at "peak [[woke]]ness". See: <nowiki>[[Essay: Peak wokeness. Are we there yet? A new conservative age rising|Peak wokeness. Are we there yet? A new conservative age rising]]</nowiki>"
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::::::And you can't support your neoconservative claim either - especially since I explicitly say that I agree with Trump being against senseless forever wars.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::::::::Again, if you want to believe that Russia has a bright future, go ahead. But I will still have a bearish view. 09:09, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | :::::::::"In addition, there are U.S. government employees/departments" - that is American [[law]] that the United States is trying to impose upon the rest of the world through its "[[rules based order]]". Your "United States will be the leading power in the world for the foreseeable future" sounds like a nightmare. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 09:25, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::::::Bottomline: You have no understanding or interest in [[foreign policy]], and again have admitted that you only create these pro-neocon, pro-LGBT Biden apologias out of spite toward another editor. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 09:05, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | {{warning collapse|reason=off-topic, non-responsive|content=I predicted China's financial troubles - you did not. I was right about the specific month of April 2020 not being pivotal for 3 decades too.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | And China's future financial problems is going to have a bad effect on Russian oil sales to China. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:14, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | :Rob, you aren't even a very good hyper Russophile cheerleader, let alone a good political commentator and forecaster. If you were a better spokesperson for Russia, Conservapedia's [[Saint Petersburg]] article wouldn't be such a pictureless drab article that receives few monthly views. It's such a beautiful city, but you neglect to sufficiently empahasize its cultural importance or its great beauty. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:23, December 12, 2023 (EST)
| |
| − | ::Donald Trump in 2023: [https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-i-will-make-america-great-again-young-people-opinion-1847738 Donald Trump: I Will Make America Great Again for Young People ]. USA! USA! USA! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:37, December 12, 2023 (EST)}}
| |
| | | | |
| | == Greg Abbott and Israel == | | == Greg Abbott and Israel == |