Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,251
edits
Changes
mLine 417:
Line 417: − +
→Third plane crash
''What is [[electronic warfare]], and how is it possible to bring down a [[civilian]] or [[military]] aircraft?''
''What is [[electronic warfare]], and how is it possible to bring down a [[civilian]] or [[military]] aircraft?''
The subject is vast, too vast to thumbnail here. But yes, it is possible for a lone [[saboteur]] with a package no bigger than a cigar box in line-of-sight of an aircraft to disrupt its electronic instruments and communications, to the point that the pilot doesn't know if he's flying upside down, even on the [[America]]'s most sophisticated 5th generation fighter, the [[F-35]]. Some electronic controls may even be taken over by electronic warfare.
The subject is vast, too vast to thumbnail here. But yes, it is possible for a lone [[saboteur]] with a package no bigger than a cigar box in line-of-sight of an aircraft to disrupt its electronic instruments and communications, to the point that the pilot doesn't know if he's flying upside down, even on [[America]]'s most sophisticated 5th generation fighter, the [[F-35]]. Some electronic controls may even be taken over by electronic warfare.
The universal consensus is, the [[Russians]] have the most advanced [[electronic warfare]] capabilities on the [[planet]]. And this only makes sense: while [[America]] has focused on "air superiority" since the 1940s, the [[Russian]]s prioritized "air defense".
The universal consensus is, the [[Russians]] have the most advanced [[electronic warfare]] capabilities on the [[planet]]. And this only makes sense: while [[America]] has focused on "air superiority" since the 1940s, the [[Russian]]s prioritized "air defense".