Changes

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.}}

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.}}

Other acronyms, such as '''MICC''' (military-industrial-congressional-complex) or '''MICIMATT''' (military-industrial-congressional-intelligence-media-academia-think tank complex) have been developed to explain the [[deep state]] process of how military contractors, who are recipients of government defense contracts, donate to political candidates to vote for defense projects and non-profit [[think tank]]s to write reports on the need for more ever-bloated defense spending.

Other acronyms, such as '''MICC''' (military-industrial-congressional-complex) or '''MICIMATT''' (military-industrial-congressional-intelligence-media-academia-think tank complex) have been developed to explain the [[deep state]] process of how military contractors, who are recipients of government defense contracts, donate to political candidates to vote for defense projects and non-profit [[think tank]]s to write reports on the need for more ever-bloated defense spending.

 

==NATO wars==

==NATO wars==

[[File:MIC Ukraine.PNG|right|300px|thumb|]]

[[File:MIC Ukraine.PNG|right|300px|thumb|]]

''[[The Intercept]]''‘s Jon Schwarz examined returns on stocks of the five biggest defense contractors: [[Boeing]], [[Raytheon]], [[Lockheed Martin]], [[Northrop Grumman]], and General Dynamics.  Schwarz found that a $10,000 investment in stock evenly split across those five companies on the day in 2001 that then-President Georg W. Bush signed the authorization preceding the US invasion would be worth $97,295 this week, not adjusted for inflation, taxes, or fees.  According to ''The Intercept:''

''The Intercept''‘s Jon Schwarz examined returns on stocks of the five biggest defense contractors: [[Boeing]], [[Raytheon]], [[Lockheed Martin]], [[Northrop Grumman]], and General Dynamics.  Schwarz found that a $10,000 investment in stock evenly split across those five companies on the day in 2001 that then-President Georg W. Bush signed the authorization preceding the US invasion would be worth $97,295 this week, not adjusted for inflation, taxes, or fees.  According to ''The Intercept:''

{{quotebox-float|"This is a far greater return than was available in the overall [[stock market]] over the same period. $10,000 invested in an [[S&P 500]] index fund on September 18, 2001, would now be worth $61,613.  That is, defense stocks outperformed the stock market overall by 58% during the Afghanistan War."<ref>https://theintercept.com/2021/08/16/afghanistan-war-defense-stocks/</ref>}}

{{quotebox-float|"This is a far greater return than was available in the overall [[stock market]] over the same period. $10,000 invested in an [[S&P 500]] index fund on September 18, 2001, would now be worth $61,613.  That is, defense stocks outperformed the stock market overall by 58% during the Afghanistan War."<ref>https://theintercept.com/2021/08/16/afghanistan-war-defense-stocks/</ref>}}

==See also==

==See also==

==External link==

==External link==

*[https://youtu.be/lfW6oaWP40U Economics Of Military Industrial Complexes in Russia and US.], Andrei Martynov, Nov. 4, 2022

*[https://youtu.be/lfW6oaWP40U Economics Of Military Industrial Complexes in Russia and US.], Andrei Martynov, Nov. 4, 2022

[[Category:Industry]]

[[Category:Industry]]

[[Category:Military]]

[[Category:Military]]

[[Category:Government]]

[[Category:Government]]

[[Category:Economic History]]

[[Category:Economic History]]