Changes

US Secretary of State Cordell Hull said at the time while selling the idea to Congress, "there will no longer be need for spheres of influence, for alliances, for balance of power, or any other of the separate alliances through which in the unhappy past the nations strove to safeguard their security or promote their interest."  

US Secretary of State Cordell Hull said at the time while selling the idea to Congress, "there will no longer be need for spheres of influence, for alliances, for balance of power, or any other of the separate alliances through which in the unhappy past the nations strove to safeguard their security or promote their interest."  

After the [[Second World War]] many [[idealist]]s favored the notion of "outlawing" [[war]]. For example, [[Gen. Douglas MacArthur]] actually wrote in a provision outlawing war in the [[Japanese]] [[constitution]]. On the international plane however, such a broad-based exercise in [[idealism]] was more difficult to sell among [[nation state]]s. Provisions and concepts such as "[[war of aggression]]" and "[[territorial integrity]]" were crafted and written in to the Charter. By 1999, with the [[US]]-backed [[Kosovo war]] that tore out land from [[Serbia]] to create a [[NATO]] base, and the 2001 "[[Coalition of the willing]]" to violate the UN Charter and international law dispensed with the Charter. The [[United States]]' "[[rules based order]]" began supplanting the UN Charter in the "[[unipolar moment]]".  [[Weaponization of the dollar]] and multilateral [[economic sanctions]] that were not authorized or confirmed by the [[UN]], as per its Charter of member states, further made a mockery of the notion of "[[international law]]".

After the [[Second World War]] many [[idealist]]s favored the notion of "outlawing" [[war]]. For example, [[Gen. Douglas MacArthur]] actually wrote in a provision outlawing war in the [[Japanese]] [[constitution]]. On the international plane however, such a broad-based exercise in [[idealism]] was more difficult to sell among [[nation state]]s. Provisions and concepts such as "[[war of aggression]]" and "[[territorial integrity]]" were crafted and written in to the Charter. By 1999, with the [[US]]-backed [[Kosovo war]] that tore out land from [[Serbia]] to create a [[NATO]] base, and the 2001 "[[Coalition of the willing]]" to violate the UN Charter and international law dispensed with the Charter. The [[United States]]' "[[rules based order]]" began supplanting the UN Charter in the "[[unipolar moment]]".  [[Weaponization of the dollar]] and [[multilateral]] [[economic sanctions]] that were not authorized or confirmed by the [[UN]], as per its Charter of member states, further made a mockery of the notion of "[[international law]]".

American enthusiasm for the UN soured after the [[Soviet Union]] vetoed most resolutions of the Security Council.  However, the Soviets boycotted the UN in 1950, allowing the UN to officially sponsor the [[Korean War]]. However, North Dakota Congressman Usher L. Burdick in a January 17, 1957 speech titled "The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any military action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations" strongly implied that the Soviets nevertheless had indirect influence on the United Nations during the Korean War via its Security Council Secretary due to how it was structured, and that this was ultimately the reason why General MacArthur was unable to fully liberate Korea from Communism during the Korean War.<ref>[http://www.iahf.com/world/un-milit.html]<br />"The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any military action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations", Rep. Usher L. Burdick, North Dakota, January 17, 1957:<br />"This means that since the Security Council was organized, the Russians, through the Secretary [of the Security Council], have had close touch with all military plans. The directives to MacArthur and the reports coming from him, passed through the hands of this Secretary. Now can you realize what MacArthur was up against in trying to win the Korean War?"</ref> In practice, the U.S. made all the decisions for the UN regarding that war. When the Soviets returned in 1951, they caused UN decisionmaking to stalemate, and the UN played a minor role in the [[Cold War]].

American enthusiasm for the UN soured after the [[Soviet Union]] vetoed most resolutions of the Security Council.  However, the Soviets boycotted the UN in 1950, allowing the UN to officially sponsor the [[Korean War]]. However, North Dakota Congressman Usher L. Burdick in a January 17, 1957 speech titled "The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any military action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations" strongly implied that the Soviets nevertheless had indirect influence on the United Nations during the Korean War via its Security Council Secretary due to how it was structured, and that this was ultimately the reason why General MacArthur was unable to fully liberate Korea from Communism during the Korean War.<ref>[http://www.iahf.com/world/un-milit.html]<br />"The Russians are and will continue to be on the inside of any military action taken by the Security Council of the United Nations", Rep. Usher L. Burdick, North Dakota, January 17, 1957:<br />"This means that since the Security Council was organized, the Russians, through the Secretary [of the Security Council], have had close touch with all military plans. The directives to MacArthur and the reports coming from him, passed through the hands of this Secretary. Now can you realize what MacArthur was up against in trying to win the Korean War?"</ref> In practice, the U.S. made all the decisions for the UN regarding that war. When the Soviets returned in 1951, they caused UN decisionmaking to stalemate, and the UN played a minor role in the [[Cold War]].