Changes

Line 1,256: Line 1,256:  
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
 
It's hard to dispute any of that, and corroborated by most reputable analysts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 22:12, January 1, 2026 (EST)
 
It's hard to dispute any of that, and corroborated by most reputable analysts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Recovering Republican]]</sup> 22:12, January 1, 2026 (EST)
−
[[File:8fa5d59378f8f7333b0f95d8d5b6b738 o.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The attack meets two of the criterion set forth in the "[[Russia#2024_revisions|Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence]]".]]
+
 
 
*[[Larry C Johnson]]: [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/yes-the-cia-is-lying-about-the-drone Yes, the CIA is Lying About the Drone Attack on Putin]
 
*[[Larry C Johnson]]: [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/yes-the-cia-is-lying-about-the-drone Yes, the CIA is Lying About the Drone Attack on Putin]
 
:''"Did you catch the Male Bovine Excrement ([[BS|MBE]]) in the so called [[CIA]] debunking?''
 
:''"Did you catch the Male Bovine Excrement ([[BS|MBE]]) in the so called [[CIA]] debunking?''
Line 1,262: Line 1,262:  
:''"How does the CIA know that the Ukrainians were aiming at a military target near the Putin residence since all of the drones were shot down? Did the Ukrainians tell their CIA handlers or was it something more sinister. Let’s start with the fact that the CIA tacitly admitted that, as the Russians claimed, 91 drones were shot down. '''If no drones had been launched''' — which the Russians already had debunked by showing the flight paths of each — '''then the CIA should have simply said, “No drones were launched.”'''''
 
:''"How does the CIA know that the Ukrainians were aiming at a military target near the Putin residence since all of the drones were shot down? Did the Ukrainians tell their CIA handlers or was it something more sinister. Let’s start with the fact that the CIA tacitly admitted that, as the Russians claimed, 91 drones were shot down. '''If no drones had been launched''' — which the Russians already had debunked by showing the flight paths of each — '''then the CIA should have simply said, “No drones were launched.”'''''
 
:''"I think it is something potentially more sinister… '''Did the CIA know about the intended target because CIA personnel provided Ukraine with the targeting data?''' This may be the reason that the Russians are so furious about a drone attack that didn’t kill anyone."''
 
:''"I think it is something potentially more sinister… '''Did the CIA know about the intended target because CIA personnel provided Ukraine with the targeting data?''' This may be the reason that the Russians are so furious about a drone attack that didn’t kill anyone."''
−
Note: By admission, the CIA is also saying Ukraine is [[lying]], and that [[Zelensky]] either doesn't know what his own government is doing or lying himself. A third possibility: The CIA launched a [[war of aggression]] itself against the [[Russian Federation]] using its 20 admitted "secret" sites without the government of Ukraine's knowledge.
+
Note: By admission, the CIA is also saying Ukraine is [[lying]], and that [[Zelensky]] either doesn't know what his own government is doing or lying himself. A third possibility: The CIA launched a [[war of aggression]] itself against the [[Russian Federation]] using its 20 admitted "secret" sites without the government of Ukraine's knowledge.  
 +
[[File:8fa5d59378f8f7333b0f95d8d5b6b738 o.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The attack meets two of the criterion set forth in the "[[Russia#2024_revisions|Fundamentals of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence]]".]]
 
*Simplicius: [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/did-cias-secret-aiding-of-ukraines Did CIA's Secret Aiding of Ukraine's Refinery Strikes Do More Harm to Ukraine Than Russia?] ''Spoiler alert: Yes, it did. But maybe that was the plan all along.''
 
*Simplicius: [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/did-cias-secret-aiding-of-ukraines Did CIA's Secret Aiding of Ukraine's Refinery Strikes Do More Harm to Ukraine Than Russia?] ''Spoiler alert: Yes, it did. But maybe that was the plan all along.''
 
::[Eventually, I will qualify Simplicius more clearly. For now, his material stands on his own record of accuracy & the recognition he has received from other qualified experts.]
 
::[Eventually, I will qualify Simplicius more clearly. For now, his material stands on his own record of accuracy & the recognition he has received from other qualified experts.]
Line 1,279: Line 1,280:     
*[[Scott Ritter]]: [https://x.com/SprinterPress/status/2006830792979394730 The Ukrainian government cannot be considered as a negotiating party after the attempted attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the residence of the President of the Russian Federation]
 
*[[Scott Ritter]]: [https://x.com/SprinterPress/status/2006830792979394730 The Ukrainian government cannot be considered as a negotiating party after the attempted attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the residence of the President of the Russian Federation]
−
[[Negotiation]]s with [[Kyiv]] are impossible after the Ukrainian attack on [[Vladimir Putin]]'s residence?.
+
[[Negotiation]]s with [[Kyiv]] are impossible after the Ukrainian attack on [[Vladimir Putin]]'s residence.
 
:'':"The current Ukrainian government should not be seen as a party to negotiations, but as a [[terrorist organization]] that must be completely destroyed."
 
:'':"The current Ukrainian government should not be seen as a party to negotiations, but as a [[terrorist organization]] that must be completely destroyed."
  
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,096

edits