Changes

Yes, the article commits several logical fallacies. While it includes citations (e.g., Bible verses, forensic journals), these often serve biased narratives rather than balanced reasoning. Below, I outline key fallacies with examples, using a table for clarity:

Yes, the article commits several logical fallacies. While it includes citations (e.g., Bible verses, forensic journals), these often serve biased narratives rather than balanced reasoning. Below, I outline key fallacies with examples, using a table for clarity:

Fallacy TypeDescriptionExample from ArticleStraw ManMisrepresenting an opposing view to make it easier to attack, often by exaggerating or oversimplifying it.The article implies critics of Christianity might equate biblical anti-homosexuality stances (e.g., Leviticus 20:13) with endorsing modern vigilante violence, then refutes this by citing New Testament fulfillment of the Law. This sets up a distorted version of the critique (e.g., ignoring nuanced debates on biblical interpretation) to "prove" Christianity's innocence, without addressing actual arguments about historical or cultural influences on anti-LGBTQ+ attitudes.False Dichotomy (or Oversimplification)Presenting only two extreme options when more exist, ignoring nuance or middle ground.Religious sections create a binary: Christianity/Judaism = compassionate anti-violence (e.g., "befriend and witness to the homosexual with...love"), vs. Islam = unqualified endorsement of killing (quoting the Quran without context and claiming "many Muslims see that command as enforceable today"). This ignores diverse interpretations within Islam (e.g., progressive Muslim scholars) or Christianity (e.g., historical uses of Leviticus to justify discrimination), reducing complex theologies to absolutes.Cherry-Picking (or Suppression of Evidence)Selectively citing evidence that supports the conclusion while omitting contradictory data.In "Homosexual on Homosexual Violence," it highlights forensic studies claiming "overkill" and higher injury counts in same-sex homicides (e.g., 1996 American Journal of Forensic Medicine abstract) and Statistics Canada data on domestic violence rates. However, it suppresses broader context: these studies often note small sample sizes, don't prove causation, and overlook higher overall violence risks for LGBTQ+ people from external sources (e.g., FBI hate crime stats showing anti-LGBTQ+ incidents outnumber intra-community ones). The focus shifts blame inward, minimizing "gay bashing" as the core issue.Ad Hominem (or Loaded Language with Bias)Attacking or biasing against a group/person through derogatory terms rather than engaging arguments.Phrases like "Palestinian-apologetic Biden administration" and "racist terror ('pay-for-slay')" dismiss policy critiques without evidence, using inflammatory rhetoric to imply moral corruption. Similarly, unsubstantiated claims of "rise in gay bashing by Muslim migrants" (citing Rebel Media, a partisan source) stereotype an entire group without addressing socioeconomic factors or counter-data on declining hate crimes in Europe.Appeal to Authority (Selective)Relying on authorities whose expertise is tangential or biased toward the conclusion.Quotes from conservative Christian sources (e.g., Got Questions Ministries, The Master's Seminary) on theology, or pathologists like Bernard Knight on "most violent homicides...among male homosexuals," are presented as definitive. These authorities align with Conservapedia's worldview but aren't balanced against opposing experts (e.g., sociologists on hate crime epidemiology), creating an echo chamber effect.

Fallacy TypeDescription

Now that [[Grok]] has clarified [[User:Conservative]]'s understanding of [[conservativism]] to equate with [[antisemitism]], it all makes sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]} 23:18, October 12, 2025 (EDT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comment: Now that [[Grok]] has clarified [[User:Conservative]]'s understanding of [[conservativism]] to equate with [[antisemitism]], it all makes sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]} 23:18, October 12, 2025 (EDT)

 

Note: Misquoting or misapplying scripture is the same as taking the Lord's name in vane. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]} 11:19, February 24, 2026 (EST)

==Can writing cause a [[violent]] reaction in some people?==

==Can writing cause a [[violent]] reaction in some people?==

*[https://slaynews.com/news/mar-a-lago-assassin-obsessed-false-allegations-linking-trump-epstein/ Would-Be Mar-a-Lago Assassin Was Obsessed with False Allegations Linking Trump to Epstein].

*[https://slaynews.com/news/mar-a-lago-assassin-obsessed-false-allegations-linking-trump-epstein/ Would-Be Mar-a-Lago Assassin Was Obsessed with False Allegations Linking Trump to Epstein].

You may recall, [[Alex Jones]] was cancelled in a similar incident in the [[Pizzagate]] scandal. The issue here is [[ethics]] and the responsibility of the writer. Anyone familiar with the author who subscribes to the "uncensored" Sysop email list can see the hatred in the heart of the same author toward other people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]} 10:06, February 24, 2026 (EST)

You may recall, [[Alex Jones]] was cancelled in a similar incident in the [[Pizzagate]] scandal. The issue here is [[ethics]] and the responsibility of the writer. Anyone familiar with the author who subscribes to the "uncensored" Sysop email list can see the hatred in the heart of the same author toward other people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Abnormal is fine. Stupid isn't.]]} 10:06, February 24, 2026 (EST)