SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
541
edits
Changes
→Socially Liberal Live-Action Films
|2013
|2013
|PG-18
|PG-18
|The film tried to normalize the idea of young boys having affairs with their friends' mothers. The movie failed miserably even with its many famous casting. The budget of the movie was 16$ but it only got around 2.5$ million at the box office. Even the liberal-leaning [[Rotten Tomatoes]] had a 33% rating.
|The film tried to normalize the idea of young boys having affairs with their friends' mothers. The movie failed miserably even with its many famous cast members. The movie's budget was $16 million, but it only grossed around $2.5 million at the box office. Even the liberal-leaning [[Rotten Tomatoes]] had a 33% rating.
|$16,000,000
|$16,000,000
|-
|-
|1999
|1999
|R
|R
|Directed by homosexual Sam Mandes, this slice-of-life drama follows Lester Burnham, a depressed, middle-aged, unhappily married advertising executive who enters his midlife crisis and starts living like the rebellious teenager he was in the early 1970s when he becomes [[pedophilia|pedophilically]] interested in his 16-year-old daughter Jane's friend and high school classmate Angela Hayes, who often brags to her peers about being sexually experienced with older men. Only when he learns she is a virgin does he finally relent. Meanwhile, Lester's wife Carolyn has an affair with another married man. Likewise, Jane starts dating new neighbor boy Ricky Fitts, a would-be experimental filmmaker who pays for supplies by dealing [[marijuana]]. Ricky has a troubled relationship with his father Colonel Frank, a negative representation of the military who is outwardly abusive towards his son and intolerant of homosexuals but is also secretly "closeted" himself and goes so far as to murder Lester, to whom he is attracted, to keep it a secret.
|Directed by homosexual Sam Mandes, this slice-of-life drama follows Lester Burnham, a depressed, middle-aged, unhappily married advertising executive who enters his midlife crisis and starts living like the rebellious teenager he was in the early 1970s when he becomes [[pedophilia|pedophilically]] interested in his 16-year-old daughter Jane's friend and high school classmate Angela Hayes, who often brags to her peers about being sexually experienced with older men. Only when he learns she is a virgin does he finally relent. Meanwhile, Lester's wife, Carolyn, has an affair with another married man. Likewise, Jane starts dating new neighbor boy Ricky Fitts, a would-be experimental filmmaker who pays for supplies by dealing [[marijuana]]. Ricky has a troubled relationship with his father, Colonel Frank, a negative representation of the military who is outwardly abusive towards his son and intolerant of homosexuals, but is also secretly "closeted" himself and goes so far as to murder Lester, to whom he is attracted, to keep it a secret.
|
|
|-
|-
|2020
|2020
|PG-18
|PG-18
|Is a history revisionist and immoral movie that produced by woke [[BBC]] and starred by woke actresses Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan. The movie portrayed the English palaeontologist and fossil collector Marie Anning (1799-1847) and English geologist Charlotte Murchison (1788-1869) as women who had lesbian affair with many sexual explicit scenes which has no historical evidence prove that. Despite objection of Anning family, producers continued with their distortion. Although the movie was nominated to many awards by woke liberal critics, it was a huge disaster to producers by only gaining $1.4 million with budget of $13.4 million.
|Is a history revisionist and immoral movie that was produced by the woke [[BBC]] and starred by woke actresses Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan. The movie portrayed the English paleontologist and fossil collector Marie Anning (1799-1847) and English geologist Charlotte Murchison (1788-1869) as women who had a lesbian affair with many sexually explicit scenes, which has no historical evidence to prove that. Despite the objections of the Anning family, producers continued with their distortion. Although the movie was nominated for many awards by woke liberal critics, it was a huge disaster for producers, gaining only gaining $1.4 million with a budget of $13.4 million.
|$13.4 million
|$13.4 million
|-
|-
|2019
|2019
|R
|R
|This Swedish-[[Republic of Georgia|Georgian]] co-production pushes the homosexual agenda as it presents the story of a dancer who leaves his girlfriend and longtime dance partner to begin a homosexual affair with another male dancer. Controversy erupted and protests occurred when the movie was shown in its native Georgia due to the film's homosexual theme. On account of that theme, it did very poorly at the box office.
|This Swedish-[[Republic of Georgia|Georgian]] co-production pushes the homosexual agenda as it presents the story of a dancer who leaves his girlfriend and longtime dance partner to begin a homosexual affair with another male dancer. Controversy erupted, and protests occurred when the movie was shown in its native Georgia due to the film's homosexual theme. On account of that theme, it did very poorly at the box office.
|$281,159
|$281,159
|-
|-
|1978, full title ''National Lampoon's Animal House''
|1978, full title ''National Lampoon's Animal House''
|R
|R
|This college "comedy" glorifies [[alcohol abuse]], debauchery, [[nihilism]], cheating, extramarital sex, and all varieties of youthful rebellion. The dean, played by John Vernon, suggests that being "Fat, drunk and stupid, son, is no way to go through life" to one of the rebellious youth representing the rowdy Delta Tau Chi fraternity, but he's depicted as the villain because of that. After the Delta boys are finally punished by being collectively expelled from college, they exact their revenge by sabotaging a homecoming parade and do not face punishment for such a great misdeed. Even so, the film's "hero", portrayed by one of Hollywood's most amoral actors ever, John Belushi, goes on to become a U.S. Senator, which is passed off as humorous.
|This college "comedy" glorifies [[alcohol abuse]], debauchery, [[nihilism]], cheating, extramarital sex, and all varieties of youthful rebellion. The dean, played by John Vernon, suggests that being "Fat, drunk, and stupid, son, is no way to go through life" to one of the rebellious youth representing the rowdy Delta Tau Chi fraternity, but he's depicted as the villain because of that. After the Delta boys are finally punished by being collectively expelled from college, they exact their revenge by sabotaging a homecoming parade, and do not face punishment for such a great misdeed. Even so, the film's "hero", portrayed by one of Hollywood's most amoral actors ever, John Belushi, goes on to become a U.S. Senator, which is passed off as humorous.
|$141,600,000
|$141,600,000
|-
|-
|2024
|2024
|
|
|Sexual explicit porn movie filled with anti Russian propaganda. The film failed miserably at box office and didnt gain over 40$ million, but despite that was awarded with Academy award for best picture.
| A sexually explicit porn movie filled with anti-Russian propaganda. The film failed miserably at the box office and didn't gain over 40$ million, but despite that, it was awarded the Academy Award for Best Picture.
|$6 million
|$6 million
|-
|-
|2024
|2024
|
|
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mother’s ditching her responsibilities, to go wild. The movie released in Christmas and lead by liberal actress Nicole Kidman, the movie normalize cheating wife, porn addiction and [[BDSM]]. The movie got huge push from liberal critics in [[Rotten Tomatoes]] with 76%, but got humiliated by audience rating with 48%.
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mothers ditching their responsibilities to go wild. The movie was released in Christmas and led by liberal actress Nicole Kidman, the movie normalizes cheating wives, porn addiction, and [[BDSM]]. The movie got a huge push from liberal critics in [[Rotten Tomatoes]] with 76%, but got humiliated by audience rating with 48%.
|$20 million
|$20 million
|-
|-
|2016
|2016
|R
|R
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mother’s ditching their responsibilities, to go wild.
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mothers ditching their responsibilities to go wild.
|$113,257,297
|$113,257,297
|-
|-
|2003
|2003
|R
|R
|This insult to the sacred holiday of Christmas features gratuitous coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and the main plot involving a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.
|This insult to the sacred holiday of Christmas features gratuitous coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and the main plot involving a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus, as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, being disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.
|$60 million
|$60 million
|-
|-
|2016
|2016
|R
|R
|This sequel follows the already revolting ''Bad Santa''. Miramax, which distributed this movie as well as its predecessor, was acquired in 2016 by beIN Media Group, which is owned by Islamic propaganda channel [[Al Jazeera]].
|This sequel follows the already-revolting ''Bad Santa''. Miramax, which distributed this movie as well as its predecessor, was acquired in 2016 by beIN Media Group, which is owned by Islamic propaganda channel [[Al Jazeera]].
|$23.2 million
|$23.2 million
|-
|-
| 2023
| 2023
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Based on the iconic titular fashion doll and directed by liberal misa-feminist Greta Gerwig, ''Barbie'' is a [[feminist]], [[misandrist]] and pro-transgender and gender division agenda film depicting the fantasy realm of Barbieland as a matriarchal utopia where all the different variations of Barbie hold important jobs (including Doctor Barbie, portrayed by a bilogical man) and their male Ken counterparts are unemployed outcasts alongside discontinued toylines. The marketing, knowing perfectly people would not come to see the movie, released every trailer showing just few vague and neutral seconds of the film to trick the public into believing it was just a genuine, apolitical and neutral Barbie-style comedy movie, with Mattel executives panicking to the point of stating via interview that the ''Barbie'' is absolutely not a feminist agenda-driven movie in an attempt to avoid another potential boycott, despite the words of the cast and Greta Gerwig stating the contrary (with also creepy and disturbing statements about "educating the public" on "problematic gender roles/norms" as a "social construct") and other red flags months before the release in the theaters. One obvious message is that the matriarchal Barbieland, where the Kens are treated as insignificant, weak, superfluous and unimportant "accessories", is the perfect and ideal world compared to the "patriarchal society" in the "real world", despite the fact that the modern Western world described by the film and Greta Gerwig is far from being such a patriarchal and dystopian society. Gerwig self-inserts herself briefly like liberal, feminist and leftist directors typically do as further proof of their disturbing and creepy narcissism, egocentrism and self-absorption.
|Based on the iconic titular fashion doll and directed by liberal misa-feminist Greta Gerwig, ''Barbie'' is a [[feminist]], [[misandrist]] and pro-transgender and gender division agenda film depicting the fantasy realm of Barbieland as a matriarchal utopia where all the different variations of Barbie hold important jobs (including Doctor Barbie, portrayed by a bilogical man) and their male Ken counterparts are unemployed outcasts alongside discontinued toylines. The marketing, knowing perfectly people would not come to see the movie, released every trailer showing just few vague and neutral seconds of the film to trick the public into believing it was just a genuine, apolitical and neutral Barbie-style comedy movie, with Mattel executives panicking to the point of stating via interview that the ''Barbie'' is absolutely not a feminist agenda-driven movie in an attempt to avoid another potential boycott, despite the words of the cast and Greta Gerwig stating the contrary (with also creepy and disturbing statements about "educating the public" on "problematic gender roles/norms" as a "social construct") and other red flags months before the release in the theaters. One obvious message is that the matriarchal Barbieland, where the Kens are treated as insignificant, weak, superfluous, and unimportant "accessories", is the perfect and ideal world compared to the "patriarchal society" in the "real world", despite the fact that the modern Western world described by the film and Greta Gerwig is far from being such a patriarchal and dystopian society. Gerwig self-inserts herself briefly like liberal, feminist, and leftist directors typically do as further proof of their disturbing and creepy narcissism, egocentrism, and self-absorption.
| $337 million
| $337 million
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|
|
|Promote promiscuity, alcoholism and drug addiction and portrayed Pastors and Nuns in bad shape. The revenue for movie was huge failure. The movie got 0% rating in liberal notoriously biased website [[Rotten Tomatoes]].
|This movie promotes promiscuity, alcoholism and drug addiction, and it portrays pastors and nuns negatively. The revenue for the movie was a huge failure. The movie got 0% rating on the notoriously liberal, biased website [[Rotten Tomatoes]].
|$422,697
|$422,697
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|
|
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie which also portrays Christians as "hateful bigots". The film has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies by critics and audiences alike, even among homosexuals. Wikipedia also acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page "List of movies considered the worst". It was a major box-office bomb.
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie that also portrays Christians as "hateful bigots". The film has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies by critics and audiences alike, even among homosexuals. Wikipedia also acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page "List of movies considered the worst". It was a major box-office bomb.
|$40,000
|$40,000
|-
|-
|2001
|2001
|R
|R
|Glorifies the life of drug dealer, and suspected murderer, George Jung.
|Glorifies the life of drug dealer and suspected murderer George Jung.
|$52,990,775
|$52,990,775
|-
|-
|2013
|2013
|NC-17
|NC-17
|This French film supports the [[homosexual agenda]] by graphically showing lesbian sex and falsely idealizing the concept that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize. It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex "marriage"]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars of the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.
|This French film supports the [[homosexual agenda]] by graphically showing lesbian sex and falsely idealizing the concept that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize. It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex "marriage"]] eight days prior. At least one of the film's stars admitted she felt disgusted by her role.
|$2,199,787
|$2,199,787
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|R
|R
|This film about two men who accidentally aboard a gay cruise shamelessly promotes the homosexual agenda and presents the attempted sexual assault of a man by a woman as "humorous".
|This film, about two men who accidentally board a gay cruise, shamelessly promotes the homosexual agenda and presents the attempted sexual assault of a man by a woman as "humorous".
|$15,020,293<ref>https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=boattrip.htm</ref>
|$15,020,293<ref>https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=boattrip.htm</ref>
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|R
|R
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, this slice-of-life drama, which took exactly 12 years to produce to capture realistic age progression for the cast, downplays the importance a father has on a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking. The lead actor, Ellar Coltrane, later "came out" as "non-binary", and has accomplished nothing noteworthy since.
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, this slice-of-life drama, which took exactly 12 years to produce to capture realistic age progression for the cast, downplays the importance of a father in a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking. The lead actor, Ellar Coltrane, later "came out" as "non-binary" and has accomplished nothing noteworthy since.
|$44,400,000
|$44,400,000
|-
|-
|1999
|1999
|R
|R
|It glorifies the choice of a young girl to embrace homosexual and transgender life choices, dishonesty, and pre-marital relations. Furthermore, it caricatures and exaggerates natural reactions to her perversion, all in aid of promoting the [[homosexual agenda]]. On that note, JoAnn Brandon, the real life mother of Teena Brandon (the aforementioned woman who entered those lifestyles), condemned the movie and especially the star Hilary Swank's acceptance speech (in particular, the former failing to specifically state the reason why Teena cross-dressed was due to mental and emotional trauma from her earlier being molested by a man while she was very young, and the latter for claiming that "Teena" was in fact male when thanking Teena).<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/film/2000/mar/29/oscars2000.oscars</ref>
|It glorifies the choice of a young girl to embrace homosexual and transgender life choices, dishonesty, and premarital relations. Furthermore, it caricatures and exaggerates natural reactions to her perversion, all in aid of promoting the [[homosexual agenda]]. On that note, JoAnn Brandon, the real life mother of Teena Brandon (the aforementioned woman who entered those lifestyles), condemned the movie and especially the star Hilary Swank's acceptance speech (in particular, the former failing to specifically state the reason why Teena cross-dressed was due to mental and emotional trauma from her earlier being molested by a man while she was very young, and the latter for claiming that "Teena" was in fact male when thanking Teena).<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/film/2000/mar/29/oscars2000.oscars</ref>
|$11,533,945
|$11,533,945
|-
|-
|1995
|1995
|R
|R
|A movie starred by liberal and atheist actress [[Meryl Streep]] about disloyal wife who instead want to have Christian burial beside her husband, she decided that she want to be [[Cremation|cremated]] for honor of her lover that she cheated on her husband with.
|A movie starring liberal and atheist actress [[Meryl Streep]] about a disloyal wife who instead wants to have a Christian burial beside her husband, she decided that she wants to be [[Cremation|cremated]] in honor of her lover that she cheated on her husband with.
|$22 million
|$22 million
|-
|-
|2005
|2005
|R (Should be NC-17)
|R (Should be NC-17)
|This nauseating "romance" film proves that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns. It was also an early example of production companies dictating film distribution services of what they should distribute to the local level, often against the distributor's own decisions.
|This nauseating "romance" film proves that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns. It was also an early example of production companies dictating to distributors what they should distribute at the local level, often against the distributor's own decisions.
|$83,043,761
|$83,043,761
|-
|-
|2016
|2016
|R
|R
|This vulgar film is loaded with sex jokes, sex scenes, nudity, one graphic elephant sex scene, and a joke about Donald Trump getting AIDS. Luckily it was a box office bomb.<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2016/03/14/box-office-brothers-grimsby-flopped-because-it-didnt-look-good/#4a36b6f749d7</ref>
|This vulgar film is loaded with sex jokes, sex scenes, nudity, one graphic elephant sex scene, and a joke about Donald Trump getting AIDS. Luckily, it was a box office bomb.<ref>https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2016/03/14/box-office-brothers-grimsby-flopped-because-it-didnt-look-good/#4a36b6f749d7</ref>
|$6,874,837
|$6,874,837
|-
|-
|1979
|1979
|UR (should be NC-17)
|UR (should be NC-17)
|This historical drama about infamous Roman emperor of the same name has been considered the most pornographic movie ever made, which led to it being a critical failure. It has unsimulated scenes of oral and anal sex, incest, and close-ups of the genitalia of both sexes, along with brutal violence. Upon release, several U.S. cities tried to prevent the movie from being played, though liberal courts repeatedly affirmed that it passed the Miller test (claiming that it was not obscene enough to be banned). Some lawyers defending it even lamented that it helped to form a conservative morality, which may have helped Ronald Reagan win the 1980 presidental election.
|This historical drama about the infamous Roman emperor of the same name has been considered the most pornographic movie ever made, which led to it being a critical failure. It has unsimulated scenes of oral and anal sex, incest, and close-ups of the genitalia of both sexes, along with brutal violence. Upon its release, several U.S. cities tried to prevent the movie from being shown, though liberal courts repeatedly affirmed that it met the Miller test (finding it not obscene enough to be banned). Some lawyers defending it even lamented that it helped to form a conservative morality, which may have helped Ronald Reagan win the 1980 presidential election.
|$23 million
|$23 million
|-
|-
|2019
|2019
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Based on the eponymous Marvel Comics superheroine (although the original incarnation of the Marvel character in the comics was a male alien superhero, not to be confused with the older Captain Marvel aka Shazam from DC Comics) and set in 1995, the twenty-first installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows Carol Danvers as she becomes Captain Marvel after Earth is caught in the center of a galactic conflict between two alien civilizations. In contrast to the rest of the film series up to this point, ''Captain Marvel'' is explicitly feministic, one example showing a deleted scene with Captain Marvel threatening a man for mild flirts including "Smile for me" and stealing his belongings. During an interview, Captain Marvel's actress Brie Larson shows some sexism, [[ageism]] and self-loathing [[racism]] by saying that she "won't accept reviews about the movie from 40 y.o. white men" (even though she is herself white). The film was also notorious for Disney and Marvel going to extremes to ensure it had any chance at a box office success, including forcing theaters to make it the single showing for a week, buying tickets and lying on the importance of the film to understand ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' released the same year.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/some-reports-indicate-captain-marvel-is-the-only-movie-playing-at-some-theaters-during-premiere-week/78446/</ref><ref>https://youtu.be/KBeUffaNxkY</ref><ref>https://cosmicbook.news/disney-manipulated-captain-marvel-perception</ref><ref>https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/03/13/new-reports-of-empty-theaters-at-captain-marvel-add-to-movies-controversy/</ref> as well as having Rotten Tomatoes remove its negative reviews of the film.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/rotten-tomatoes-removes-thousands-of-negative-captain-marvel-user-ratings/79348/</ref><ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-censorship-circumvented-thanks-to-dissenter-extension/78084/</ref>
|Based on the eponymous Marvel Comics superheroine (although the original incarnation of the Marvel character in the comics was a male alien superhero, not to be confused with the older Captain Marvel aka Shazam from DC Comics) and set in 1995, the twenty-first installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows Carol Danvers as she becomes Captain Marvel after Earth is caught in the center of a galactic conflict between two alien civilizations. In contrast to the rest of the film series up to this point, ''Captain Marvel'' is explicitly feminist, one example showing a deleted scene with Captain Marvel threatening a man for mild flirts, including "Smile for me" and stealing his belongings. During an interview, Captain Marvel's actress Brie Larson shows some sexism, [[ageism]], and self-loathing [[racism]] by saying that she "won't accept reviews about the movie from 40-year-old white men" (even though she is herself white). The film was also notorious for Disney and Marvel going to extremes to ensure it had any chance at a box office success, including forcing theaters to make it the single showing for a week, buying tickets and lying on the importance of the film to understand ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' released the same year.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/some-reports-indicate-captain-marvel-is-the-only-movie-playing-at-some-theaters-during-premiere-week/78446/</ref><ref>https://youtu.be/KBeUffaNxkY</ref><ref>https://cosmicbook.news/disney-manipulated-captain-marvel-perception</ref><ref>https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/03/13/new-reports-of-empty-theaters-at-captain-marvel-add-to-movies-controversy/</ref> as well as having Rotten Tomatoes remove its negative reviews of the film.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/rotten-tomatoes-removes-thousands-of-negative-captain-marvel-user-ratings/79348/</ref><ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-censorship-circumvented-thanks-to-dissenter-extension/78084/</ref>
|$1.128 billion
|$1.128 billion
|-
|-
|2024
|2024
|PG-18
|PG-18
|The movie promote promiscuous and pervert homo affairs between married couples.
|The movie promotes promiscuous and perverse homosexual affairs between married couples.
|$31,569,268
|$31,569,268
|-
|-
|2022
|2022
|PG (Should be PG-13)
|PG (Should be PG-13)
|This third installment of the franchise clearly shows 20th Century Fox's ownership by Disney, as it departs from the family friendliness of the original and the 1st sequel in that it has several sex scenes plus it pushes race baiting.
|This third installment of the franchise clearly shows 20th Century Fox's ownership by Disney, as it departs from the family friendliness of the original and the 1st sequel in that it has several sex scenes, plus it pushes race-baiting.
|-
|-
|''Chuck & Buck''
|''Chuck & Buck''
|2000
|2000
|R
|R
|Debauched independent film about a man who revisits another man he traumatized through sexual grooming as a child. The message is that in some instances, groomers are the real victims and greatly misunderstood because of their need for casual sex. Also, if their victims weren't "brainwashed" by moralistic views about sex, most of them would consent to it and see it as a good thing, and no trauma would ever happen. In the film, when he meets the man he seduced in their youth, he encourages him to cheat on his wife, who is "holding him back", and have sex with him in order to desensitize him to hedonism and see monogamy as a perversion. The director and writer of the film is openly bisexual, and plays the role of the groomer who initiates the encounter. He admits it is based on his experiences and fantasies.
|Debauched independent film about a man who revisits another man he traumatized through sexual grooming as a child. The message is that in some instances, groomers are the real victims and greatly misunderstood because of their need for casual sex. Also, if their victims weren't "brainwashed" by moralistic views about sex, most of them would consent to it and see it as a good thing, and no trauma would ever happen. In the film, when he meets the man he seduced in their youth, he encourages him to cheat on his wife, who is "holding him back", and have sex with him in order to desensitize him to hedonism and see monogamy as a perversion. The director and writer of the film is openly bisexual, and plays the role of the groomer who initiates the encounter. He admits it is based on his experiences and fantasies.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|-
|1994
|1994
|R
|R
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17 before being appealed for an R rating.
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17, then appealed for an R rating.
|$3,151,130
|$3,151,130
|-
|-
|2006
|2006
|R
|R
|Sequel to the liberal comedy, filled with more profanity and even more disgusting acts that could not be in the budget of the original film.
|Sequel to the liberal comedy, filled with more profanity and even more disgusting acts that would not have been in the budget of the original film.
|$24,148,068
|$24,148,068
|-
|-
|1994
|1994
|NR
|NR
|HBO trilogy focusing on minority science fiction. The main claim to fame was an adaptation of ''[[The Space Traders]]'', a race-baiting short story that was written by the infamous race-baiting leftist professor Derrick Bell.
|HBO trilogy focusing on minority science fiction. The main claim to fame was an adaptation of ''[[The Space Traders]]'', a race-baiting short story written by the infamous leftist race-baiter Derrick Bell.
|-
|-
|''Cradle 2 the Grave''
|''Cradle 2 the Grave''
|2003
|2003
|MPAA
|MPAA
|At first your typical buddy cop movie with lots of explosions, shootings and hand-to-hand combats with a global threat and conspiracy and the kidnapping of the child of one of the protagonists as central parts to the plot. However, there's a creepy and disturbing particular element that saying it is "aged badly" since its very release would be a gigantic euphemism. To start a conversation, Agent Su asks Anthony if his 8, almost 9 y.o. daughter already has a "little boyfriend", and Anthony replies with a straight "never" and that he would "kill them", therefore admitting with creepy and disturbing nonchalance in the presence of a cop that he would commit literal child murder. This is also a creepy potential sign of a future abusive father, and it's quite likely how liberals viewed and view conservative or traditional fathers.
|At first your typical buddy cop movie with lots of explosions, shootings and hand-to-hand combats with a global threat and conspiracy and the kidnapping of the child of one of the protagonists as central parts to the plot. However, there's a creepy and disturbing particular element that says it is "aged badly" since its very release would be a gigantic euphemism. To start a conversation, Agent Su asks Anthony if his 8, almost 9-year-old, daughter already has a "little boyfriend", and Anthony replies with a straight "never" and that he would "kill them", therefore admitting with creepy and disturbing nonchalance in the presence of a cop that he would commit literal child murder. This is also a creepy potential sign of a future abusive father, and it's quite likely how liberals viewed and view conservative or traditional fathers.
|$34,657,731
|$34,657,731
|-
|-
|2015
|2015
|R
|R
|One of the definitive pro-homosexual/gender confusion propaganda films. Eddie Redmayne portrays Einar Wegener, a landscape artist who stands in for a female model who no-showed for a planned painting made by Wegener's wife, Gerda. Einar, who has undergone gender confusion for years, snaps as a result of the modeling sessions where he stands in as "female" and he begins claiming to be a "woman" calling himself "Lili Elbe", which nearly leads to him being committed to an asylum. Einar later undergoes surgical mutilation to accommodate his delusion, but he dies of infection due to the mutilation.
|One of the definitive pro-homosexual/gender confusion propaganda films. Eddie Redmayne portrays Einar Wegener, a landscape artist who stands in for a female model who no-shows for a painting planned by Wegener's wife, Gerda. Einar, who has undergone gender confusion for years, snaps as a result of the modeling sessions where he stands in as "female" and he begins claiming to be a "woman" calling himself "Lili Elbe", which nearly leads to him being committed to an asylum. Einar later undergoes surgical mutilation to accommodate his delusion, but he dies of infection due to the mutilation.
|$11,114,018
|$11,114,018
|-
|-
|2016
|2016
|R
|R
|Poor family values, a soon-to be groom, takes his recently widowed grandfather on a road trip, he eventually leaves his finance, and ends up with a hippie instead. Drug-usage is present, and clearly pro-LGBT, with a supporting character being gay.
|Poor family values, a soon-to be groom, takes his recently widowed grandfather on a road trip, he eventually leaves his finance, and ends up with a hippie instead. Drug usage is present, and clearly pro-LGBT, with a supporting character being gay.
|$35,593,113
|$35,593,113
|-
|-
|2016
|2016
|R
|R
|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The "villain" of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also feminism is present with the the leader of the thieves being a girl.
|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The "villain" of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find that he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also, feminism is present with the leader of the thieves being a girl.
|$89,217,875
|$89,217,875
|-
|-
|2022
|2022
|NR
|NR
|This movie directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expect.
|This movie was directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received a low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expected.
|35$ Million
|35$ Million
|-
|-
|1969
|1969
|R
|R
|This slice-of-life drama follows two drug-addicted motorcyclists who glorify every aspect of the hippie lifestyle.Conservatives incorrectly portrayed and generalized as racist rednecks.
|This slice-of-life drama follows two drug-addicted motorcyclists who glorify every aspect of the hippie lifestyle. Conservatives are incorrectly portrayed and generalized as racist rednecks.
|$60 million
|$60 million
|-
|-
|1988
|1988
|R
|R
|The protagonists are criminals, thieves and liars. One character even tires to kill an elderly lady, as her being the only witness to the robbery. Also promotes infidelity, with the lawyer having an affair with one of the criminals and leaving his wife and daughter.
|The protagonists are criminals, thieves, and liars. One character even tires to kill an elderly lady, as her being the only witness to the robbery. Also promotes infidelity, with the lawyer having an affair with one of the criminals and leaving his wife and daughter.
|$62,493,712
|$62,493,712
|-
|-
|1998
|1998
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Liberal and homosexual director Roland Emmerich turns Godzilla into a girl and enforces the idea that military does more damage than Godzilla. The film even fails to address the original message of the original 1954 Japanese film (the first ''Godzilla'' was created in response to fears of the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II), with the resulting film likewise being hated by Godzilla fans and by Toho Films, to the extent that the "Godzilla" in this film when later appearing in the mainline films was given a separate identity to the mainstream Godzilla and beaten easily. Liberals also panned the film, in particular a running gag which had the Mayor of New York doing a "thumbs up and thumbs down" vote in an unsubtle jab at Siskel and Ebert.
|Liberal and homosexual director Roland Emmerich turns Godzilla into a girl and enforces the idea that military does more damage than Godzilla. The film even fails to address the original message of the original 1954 Japanese film (the first ''Godzilla'' was created in response to fears of the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II), with the resulting film likewise being hated by Godzilla fans and by Toho Films, to the extent that the "Godzilla" in this film when later appearing in the mainline films was given a separate identity to the mainstream Godzilla and beaten easily. Liberals also panned the film, particularly a running gag in which the Mayor of New York cast a "thumbs up and thumbs down" vote as an unsubtle jab at Siskel and Ebert.
|$136,314,294
|$136,314,294
|-
|-
|1979
|1979
|PG (Should be R)
|PG (Should be R)
|Based on the Broadway musical, the film's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its gratuitous nudity caused much comment and controversy as it did when the stage musical first premiered in 1967. A product of the hippie counterculture and sexual revolution of the 1960s, several of its songs became anthems of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement.
|Based on the Broadway musical, the film's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its gratuitous nudity caused much comment and controversy, as it did when the stage musical first premiered in 1967. A product of the hippie counterculture and the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the group produced several songs that became anthems of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement.
|$15,284,643
|$15,284,643
|-
|-
|2018
|2018
|R (should be NC-17)
|R (should be NC-17)
|According to director Lars von Trier, this ultra-violent and sadistic serial killer film is meant to be seen as an analogy for [[Donald Trump]] (or as von Trier insultingly refers to him "Homo Trumpus") and his administration. This is a gruesome and vicious movie that glamorizes the murder of women and children - calling it a form of art. It relies heavily on Satanic imagery and Nazi iconography purely to shock and offend. Even most liberals were turned off by this movie.
|According to director Lars von Trier, this ultra-violent and sadistic serial killer film is meant to be seen as an analogy for [[Donald Trump]] (or as von Trier insultingly refers to him as "Homo Trumpus") and his administration. This is a gruesome and vicious movie that glamorizes the murder of women and children - calling it a form of art. It relies heavily on Satanic imagery and Nazi iconography purely to shock and offend. Even most liberals were turned off by this movie.
|-
|-
|''Howl''
|''Howl''
|2023
|2023
|PG-13
|PG-13
|This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the series' face, putting down Indiana Jones himself in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated.
|This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the face of Indiana Jones, putting him down in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated.
|$
|$
|-
|-
|1975
|1975
|R
|R
|Woke liberals defiled the once respected Sight & Sound magazine Greatest Films of All Time by manufacturing this to be considered the "greatest film of all time". In actuality, it's unwatchable feminist nonsense that appeals to nobody but delusional smug woke moralists who think that films directed by lesbians are inherently better.
|Woke liberals defiled the once respected Sight & Sound magazine's Greatest Films of All Time by manufacturing this to be considered the "greatest film of all time". In actuality, it's unwatchable feminist nonsense that appeals to nobody but delusional smug woke moralists who think that films directed by lesbians are inherently better.
|-
|-
|''[[Jennifer's Body]]''
|''[[Jennifer's Body]]''
|2018
|2018
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Unfortunately, Christian movie star, Chris Pratt, cannot save this film from being a liberal disaster. This film, like its predecessor, "Jurassic World," is also very supportive of feminism. In fact, that is even more apparent, as Chris Pratt's character - Owen Grady - is depicted as heartless for not wanting to save the dinosaurs and preferring to be left alone; on the flip side, the more feminist Claire Dearing is now a dinosaur rights activist, using Owen's ''Velociraptor'' Blue to get Owen to save the dinosaurs with her. At the end of the film, the dinosaurs are released into the wild, putting billions of human lives in danger, clearly giving an environmental message. Also, one of the younger characters clearly looks like an SJW, with her character acting as such. Not only that, but one of the main antagonists calls her a "nasty woman" which is clearly a jab at Donald Trump. According to one of the actresses, Daniella Pineda, there was intended to be a scene (that was fortunately cut) that revealed that her character, Zia Rodriguez, was a lesbian when admitting she was fond of Chris Pratt's character.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-star-daniella-pinedas-lesbian-reveal-cut-film-183618705.html</ref>
|Unfortunately, Christian movie star, Chris Pratt, cannot save this film from being a liberal disaster. This film, like its predecessor, "Jurassic World," is also very supportive of feminism. In fact, that is even more apparent, as Chris Pratt's character - Owen Grady - is depicted as heartless for not wanting to save the dinosaurs and preferring to be left alone; on the flip side, the more feminist Claire Dearing is now a dinosaur rights activist, using Owen's ''Velociraptor'' Blue to get Owen to save the dinosaurs with her. At the end of the film, the dinosaurs are released into the wild, putting billions of human lives in danger and clearly conveying an environmental message. Also, one of the younger characters clearly looks like an SJW, with her character acting as such. Not only that, but one of the main antagonists calls her a "nasty woman," which is clearly a jab at Donald Trump. According to one of the actresses, Daniella Pineda, there was intended to be a scene (that was fortunately cut) that revealed that her character, Zia Rodriguez, was a lesbian when admitting she was fond of Chris Pratt's character.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-star-daniella-pinedas-lesbian-reveal-cut-film-183618705.html</ref>
|$417,719,760
|$417,719,760
|-
|-
|2003
|2003
|PG (should be PG-13)
|PG (should be PG-13)
|Don’t let the trailers, posters and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He only appears in 7 minutes of the whole film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under but was retooled because the test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero played by Jerry O’Connell grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.
|Don’t let the trailers, posters and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He only appears in 7 minutes of the whole film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but it was retooled because the test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero played by Jerry O’Connell grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.
|$88,929,111
|$88,929,111
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|Unrated
|Unrated
|An adaptation of the play of the same name made by HBO to promote the homosexual agenda, including giving a one-sided, extremely biased perspective on the murder of Matthew Shepherd implying that his murderers had "homophobia" as a motive. It also has a significant anti-religious bent in it, where two of the documentarists (implied to be homosexual) tried to talk to a priest specifically to "piss him off," and also had one of the members breaking down from a priest being "hateful" simply because he implied the possibility that Matthew Shepherd will go to hell if he didn't repent for his homosexual activities.
|An adaptation of the play of the same name made by HBO to promote the homosexual agenda, including giving a one-sided, extremely biased perspective on the murder of Matthew Shepherd, implying that his murderers had "homophobia" as a motive. It also has a significant anti-religious bent in it, where two of the documentarists (implied to be homosexual) tried to talk to a priest specifically to "piss him off," and also had one of the members breaking down from a priest being "hateful" simply because he implied the possibility that Matthew Shepherd would go to hell if he didn't repent for his homosexual activities.
|-
|-
|''Legally Blonde 2: Red, White and Blonde''
|''Legally Blonde 2: Red, White and Blonde''
|1994
|1994
|R
|R
|Disgusting film the features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt [[DEA]] responsible for her parents' murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex).
|Disgusting film that features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse, her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt [[DEA]] responsible for her parents' murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex).
|$19,501,238
|$19,501,238
|-
|-
|2023
|2023
|PG
|PG
|Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case and point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more "modern times" as described as the "woke" social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].
|Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case in point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more "modern times" as described by the "woke" social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby's attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].
It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie.
It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another piece of evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie.
|$250 million
|$250 million
|-
|-
|1997
|1997
|PG-13
|PG-13
|The film is pro-environmentalist, and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message due to one of the main antagonists explicitly being a hunter; adding to that is one of the "heroes" removing bullets from the hunter's gun, putting everyone in even more danger from the dinosaurs, though no one calls him out for it. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it if anything was the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to.
|The film is pro-environmentalist and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message, as one of the main antagonists is explicitly a hunter; adding to that, one of the "heroes" removes bullets from the hunter's gun, putting everyone in even more danger from the dinosaurs, though no one calls him out for it. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it was, if anything, the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it, and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to.
|$618.6 million
|$618.6 million
|-
|-
|2024
|2024
|R
|R
|A movie that promote lesbian relationships, failed miserably and didnt cross $12 million in Box office despite huge casting such as feminist and homo actress Kristen Stewart, Ed Harris, Jena Malone and Dave Franco.
|A movie that promotes lesbian relationships failed miserably and didn't cross $12 million at the box office despite huge casting such as feminist and homo actress Kristen Stewart, Ed Harris, Jena Malone, and Dave Franco.
|
|
|-
|-
|2015
|2015
|R
|R
|Feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some "[[Plagiarism|similarities]]" to the John Wayne classic ''Stagecoach''. Fourth movie in the ''Mad Max'' film series first made famous by Mel Gibson in the title role between 1979 and 1985.
|Feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some "[[Plagiarism|similarities]]" to the John Wayne classic ''Stagecoach''. The fourth movie in the ''Mad Max'' film series, first made famous by Mel Gibson in the title role, was released between 1979 and 1985.
|$153,636,354
|$153,636,354
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|PG
|PG
|Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of "true love" (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]] and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/</ref> In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown to not care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.
|Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of "true love" (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]], and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/</ref> In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown not to care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.
|$241,410,378
|$241,410,378
|-
|-
|1997
|1997
|R
|R
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Hollywood conservative, [[Clint Eastwood]] directed this film or that it both takes place and was filmed in the overall conservative city of Savannah, Georgia. It is based on the equally bad nonfiction novel of the same name, and has LGBT, environmentalist, witchcraft, and anti-capitalist themes.
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Hollywood conservative [[Clint Eastwood]] directed this film or that it both takes place and was filmed in the overall conservative city of Savannah, Georgia. It is based on the equally bad nonfiction book of the same name and features LGBT, environmentalist, witchcraft, and anti-capitalist themes.
|$25,105,255
|$25,105,255
|-
|-
|2018
|2018
|PG-13
|PG-13
|This USA-New Zealand co-production pushes the feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some "[[Plagiarism|similarities]]" to many classics, including ''[[Star Wars]]'' and ''[[Total Recall (2012 film)|Total Recall]]''. It presents some message underlying "[[climate change]]". Currently the once-in-a-lifetime adaptation of the [[Mortal Engines Quartet|novel series]] of the same name by [[Philip Reeve]] due to leftist narratives painting the film in a positive light.
|This USA-New Zealand co-production pushes the feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some "[[Plagiarism|similarities]]" to many classics, including ''[[Star Wars]]'' and ''[[Total Recall (2012 film)|Total Recall]]''. It presents some message underlying "[[climate change]]". Currently, the once-in-a-lifetime adaptation of the [[Mortal Engines Quartet|novel series]] of the same name by [[Philip Reeve]] is due to leftist narratives painting the film in a positive light.
|
|
|-
|-
|2014
|2014
|NR
|NR
|This two-part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict. It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.
|This two-part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict. It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director Lars von Trier is known for being anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.
|$17,584,083
|$17,584,083
|-
|-
|2018
|2018
|PG
|PG
|A feminist woke movie, all the casting was composed of feminist actresses. The movie didn't get success as expected, and instead of blaming themselves or the direction of the movie, the feminist cast blamed the public and "patriarchy".
|A feminist woke movie; all the casting was composed of feminist actresses. The movie didn't get the success as expected, and instead of blaming themselves or the direction of the movie, the feminist cast blamed the public and "patriarchy".
|$70 million
|$70 million
|-
|-
|2019
|2019
|R
|R
|This Korean film inexplicably won Best Picture at the Academy Awards even though it has a highly anti-capitalist message and portrays wealth as evil.
|This Korean film inexplicably won Best Picture at the Academy Awards, even though it has a highly anti-capitalist message and portrays wealth as evil.
|$167,600,000
|$167,600,000
|-
|-
|2023
|2023
|PG
|PG
|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as both the race and gender swapping of some of the Lost Boys. Strong [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other over Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original movie; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded, barely even appearing in the film. There is nothing childlike about this film, it was not vibrantly colorful, as like the original film. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.
|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. Strong [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts, instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded, barely even appearing in the film. There is nothing childlike about this film; it was not vibrantly colorful, like the original film. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.
|N/A
|N/A
|-
|-
|1993
|1993
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Homosexual agenda setting drama.
|Homosexual agenda-setting drama.
|$77,446,440
|$77,446,440
|-
|-
|1972
|1972
|NC-17
|NC-17
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiality]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light. This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people. Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing. A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close-ups of genitalia unlike any non-pornographic film. Liberals call it a "comedy", but it is revoltingly horrid and more like an act of [[Satan]].
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiality]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light. This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language; one character is even named after a racial slur against white people. Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing. A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close-ups of genitalia, unlike any non-pornographic film. Liberals call it a "comedy", but it is revoltingly horrid and more like an act of [[Satan]].
|$7,000,000
|$7,000,000
|-
|-
|2023
|2023
|NC-17
|NC-17
|A movie starred by liberal Emma Stone with full of sex scenes that promote pedophile thoughts on women who had young girls minds.
|A movie starring liberal Emma Stone is full of sex scenes that promote pedophile thoughts on women who have young girls' minds.
|$35 million
|$35 million
|-
|-
|2012
|2012
|R
|R
|Shows teen drinking, [[drug]] use, sex, vulgar profanity and anarchic behavior to be "cool".
|Shows teen drinking, [[drug]] use, sex, vulgar profanity, and anarchic behavior to be "cool".
|$54,731,865
|$54,731,865
|-
|-
|2020
|2020
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Based on a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their "backwards" ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date, while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also demonized, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unemphatic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town are seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in a city like San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana.
|Based on a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their "backward" ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date, while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also demonized, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unemphatic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive, while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town is seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in a city like San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana.
|-
|-
|''Quills''
|''Quills''
|2000
|2000
|R
|R
|Portrays the Marquis de Sade as the protagonist, in addition to the prevalence of extremely violent acts.
|Portrays the Marquis de Sade as the protagonist, with an emphasis on extremely violent acts.
|$11,732,088
|$11,732,088
|-
|-
|2011
|2011
|PG-13
|PG-13
|An adaptation of ''Planet of the Apes'', a chimpanzee named Caesar is born with a gift of intelligence. When sent to an abusive ape center, he rallies the apes into fighting against their captors in an escape for freedom. The movie appears to be anti-business (the company the main character works for is painted in an extremely negative light), a lot of environmentalism throughout (including a more anti-human agenda being pushed), and the actor who played Caesar, Andy Serkis, as well as director Rupert Wyatt, both compared Caesar positively to the Marxist Argentinian revolutionary terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]]. The movie got sequels in 2014 (''Dawn of the Planet of the Apes''), 2017 (''War for the Planet of the Apes''), and 2024 (''Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes'').
|In this adaptation of ''Planet of the Apes'', a chimpanzee named Caesar is born with a gift of intelligence. When sent to an abusive ape center, he rallies the apes into fighting against their captors in an escape for freedom. The movie appears to be anti-business (the company the main character works for is painted in an extremely negative light), a lot of environmentalism throughout (including a more anti-human agenda being pushed), and the actor who played Caesar, Andy Serkis, as well as director Rupert Wyatt, both compared Caesar positively to the Marxist Argentinian revolutionary terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]]. The movie got sequels in 2014 (''Dawn of the Planet of the Apes''), 2017 (''War for the Planet of the Apes''), and 2024 (''Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes'').
|$481,801,049
|$481,801,049
|-
|-
|2012
|2012
|PG-13 (Director's Cut is rated R)
|PG-13 (Director's Cut is rated R)
|Based on the highly unoriginal and unimaginative Broadway musical, ''Rock of Ages'' features poor [[moral]]s, promotes homosexual agenda, prostitution, drug use, and drinking, and portrays conservatives in a negative, offensively bigoted viewpoint. Many gratuitous sex scenes and sexual references are prominently shown.
|Based on the highly unoriginal and unimaginative Broadway musical, ''Rock of Ages'' features poor [[moral]]s, promotes the homosexual agenda, prostitution, drug use, and drinking, and portrays conservatives in a negative, offensively bigoted viewpoint. Many gratuitous sex scenes and sexual references are prominently shown.
|$38,518,613
|$38,518,613
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|PG (Should be PG-13)
|PG (Should be PG-13)
|A supposed live-action satire of the iconic Hanna-Barbera cartoon. Shaggy is heavily implied to be a stoner and is a vegetarian like his original voice actor Casey Kassem. Velma is implied to be a lesbian, where deleted scenes make it more apparent. Daphne is now a blatant feminist, much like Sarah Michelle Gellar’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Fred can be a bit of a womanizer. There are plenty of raunchy innuendos, skimpy clothing among college-age women, glorifying the more decadent stereotype of Spring break, and strong language (including where Fred, possessed by a demon, says the word “b****h”). Pamela Anderson makes a cameo promoting environmentalism. The National Guard are portrayed as helpless. Written by [[James Gunn]], who would later write a more conservative and family-friendly sequel released in 2004. Gunn revealed that there was an even more vulgar version of the film in June 2017.
|A supposed live-action satire of the iconic Hanna-Barbera cartoon. Shaggy is heavily implied to be a stoner and is a vegetarian like his original voice actor, Casey Kassem. Velma is implied to be a lesbian, where deleted scenes make it more apparent. Daphne is now a blatant feminist, much like Sarah Michelle Gellar’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Fred can be a bit of a womanizer. There are plenty of raunchy innuendos, skimpy clothing among college-age women, glorifying the more decadent stereotype of Spring break, and strong language (including where Fred, possessed by a demon, says the word “b****h”). Pamela Anderson makes a cameo promoting environmentalism. The National Guard is portrayed as helpless. Written by [[James Gunn]], who would later write a more conservative and family-friendly sequel released in 2004. Gunn revealed in 2017 that an even more vulgar version of the film existed before the official movie did.
|-
|-
|''Sex and the City''
|''Sex and the City''
|2014
|2014
|R
|R
|Anti-family. The main premise of the film was two nymphomaniacs trying to create a sex tape of themselves after getting kids killed their sex drive, and then recovering iPods that accidentally uploaded their tape online for everyone to see. The ending also has brief yet graphic sex scene showing what exactly was on the sex tape.
|Anti-family. The main premise of the film was two nymphomaniacs trying to create a sex tape of themselves after getting their sex drive killed by their kids, and then recovering their iPods that accidentally uploaded their tape online for everyone to see. The ending also has a brief yet graphic sex scene showing what exactly was on the sex tape.
|$38,543,473
|$38,543,473
|-
|-
|2017
|2017
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Based on the novel of the same name, this film promotes the ancient heresy of Patripassionism, presents God the Father contrarily to how he truly is according to scripture, and promotes the dangerous idea that God does not punish sin.<ref>https://www.gotquestions.org/The-Shack-review.html</ref>
|Based on the novel of the same name, this film promotes the ancient heresy of Patripassionism, presents God the Father contrary to how he truly is according to scripture, and promotes the dangerous idea that God does not punish sin.<ref>https://www.gotquestions.org/The-Shack-review.html</ref>
|$96,942,115
|$96,942,115
|-
|-
|1995
|1995
|NC-17
|NC-17
|Filled with explicit nudity, and promotes homosexuality as well as hollywood values, as it glamorizes the Las Vegas showgirl and stripper lifestyle. MGM also, in an attempt to make it the next ''Rocky Horror Picture Show'', did a massive marketing campaign, including an audience participation script despite its rating. The film had notoriously terrible production as well, as despite MGM's efforts, the Razzie Awards gave it the "award" of worst film for the year 1995.
|Filled with explicit nudity, and promotes homosexuality as well as Hollywood values, as it glamorizes the Las Vegas showgirl and stripper lifestyle. MGM also, in an attempt to make it the next ''Rocky Horror Picture Show,'' ran a massive marketing campaign, including an audience-participation script, despite its rating. The film had notoriously terrible production values as well; despite MGM's efforts, the Razzie Awards gave it the "award" for worst film of 1995.
|$37.8 million
|$37.8 million
|-
|-
|1998
|1998
|PG-13
|PG-13
|Anti-military (due to the Commando Elite being depicted in a negative manner, and to a certain extent GloboTech, the ones responsible for the bad events in the film, being stated to be a Defense Contractor) and also anti-Capitalist (due to GloboTech being the ones responsible for the events of the film, including buying out the Heartland Toy Company.).
|Anti-military (due to the Commando Elite being depicted in a negative manner, and to a certain extent, GloboTech, the ones responsible for the bad events in the film, being stated to be a Defense Contractor) and also anti-Capitalist (due to GloboTech being the ones responsible for the events of the film, including buying out the Heartland Toy Company).
|$71.1 million
|$71.1 million
|-
|-
|2012
|2012
|R
|R
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme. Furthermore, this film promotes [[feminism]] and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as "weak" and "insecure". Also, the film contains a full-on sex scene in the pool, and show nudity, in not only that scene but several others.
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme. Furthermore, this film promotes [[feminism]] and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as "weak" and "insecure". Also, the film contains a full-on sex scene in the pool, and shows nudity, not only in that scene but also in several others.
|$31,724,284
|$31,724,284
|-
|-
|2015
|2015
|R
|R
|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film, itself, is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated the film) and failed to make its play for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.
|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film itself is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated it) and failed to make its case for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.
|$187,674
|$187,674
|-
|-
|2007
|2007
|R
|R
|Promotes the teenage use of drugs, smoking, alcohol and sex. The whole point of the movie is for a couple of guys to lose their virginity, which luckily failed by the end. The movie contains many uses of profanity, underage drinking, and drug use. The police are portrayed as dumb.
|Promotes the teenage use of drugs, smoking, alcohol, and sex. The whole point of the movie is for a couple of guys to lose their virginity, which luckily failed by the end. The movie contains many uses of profanity, underage drinking, and drug use. The police are portrayed as dumb.
|$121,463,226
|$121,463,226
|-
|-
|2009
|2009
|R
|R
|Glorifies the anarchistic and chaotic Woodstock festival in 1969 as well as the Hippie Movement, painting their various lewd actions, including homosexuality, in a positive light. Also has some elements of anti-Semitism due to the main character's parents who acted as Holocaust survivors being portrayed in an unsympathetic light.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2009/08/28/taking-woodstock-mythologizing-the-worst-generation/</ref>
|Glorifies the anarchistic and chaotic Woodstock festival in 1969 as well as the Hippie Movement, painting their various lewd actions, including homosexuality, in a positive light. Also has some elements of anti-Semitism due to the main character's parents, who acted as Holocaust survivors being portrayed in an unsympathetic light.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2009/08/28/taking-woodstock-mythologizing-the-worst-generation/</ref>
|$10 million
|$10 million
|-
|-
|2012
|2012
|R
|R
|Do not let the idea of a talking Teddy Bear fool you, there is nothing childlike about this film. In an extremely raunchy comedy style, it normalized much of the liberal agenda such as Marijuana addiction, blasphemous language and gay marriage.
|Do not let the idea of a talking Teddy Bear fool you; there is nothing childlike about this film. In an extremely raunchy comedy style, it normalized much of the liberal agenda, such as marijuana addiction, blasphemous language, and gay marriage.
|$218,815,487
|$218,815,487
|-
|-
|2006
|2006
|R
|R
|The title is self-exploratory, depicts cigarette endorsers as heroes.
|The title is self-explanatory, depicting cigarette endorsers as heroes.
|$24,793,509
|$24,793,509
|-
|-
|2021
|2021
|
|
|A survival misandrist movie starred by [[Megan Fox]], normalizing cheating on husbands and ended up by survival of the cheater wife, the movie ended horribly at box office
|This survival misandrist movie starring [[Megan Fox]] normalizes cheating on husbands, and ended with the survival of the cheating wife. The movie ended horribly at the box office
|
|
|-
|-
|2002
|2002
|PG-18
|PG-18
|Sexual explicit movie that sympathize with the cheater wife, ended up to not be punished.
| A sexually explicit movie that sympathizes with the cheating wife, ended up not being punished.
|$50 million
|$50 million
|-
|-
|1978
|1978
|R
|R
|Stoner film that just promotes the use of smoking marijuana.
|Stoner film that just promotes the use of marijuana.
|$44,364,244
|$44,364,244
|-
|-
|2008
|2008
|
|
|Promoting sexual promiscuity, threesome relationships, adultery and prostitution.
|Promoting sexual promiscuity, threesome relationships, adultery, and prostitution.
|$96.4 million
|$96.4 million
|-
|-
|2022
|2022
|NR
|NR
|The movie demonize men with fake story, which showed that Movie's hero as Slaves liberator, while she actually enslaver.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDYNImHt73g</ref>
|The movie demonizes men with a fake story, which shows the movie's hero as a slave liberator, while she is actually an enslaver.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDYNImHt73g</ref>
|50$ Million
|50$ Million
|-
|-