Changes

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries instead of caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are portrayed in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Like the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unnecessary direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film, ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series, ''Back at the Barnyard'', rather than film sequels.

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct through the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist, as some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries rather than caribou, even though wolves are natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are portrayed in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf, Kate, can be described as a modern feminist. Like the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unnecessary direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film, ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series, ''Back at the Barnyard'', rather than film sequels.

|$25,107,267

|$25,107,267

|-

|-

|2013-2017

|2013-2017

|PG

|PG

|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, for the pups of Kate and Humphrey are snarky brats who ignore their parents' orders to stay at home; they even try to justify this in the sixth movie by claiming they get into "situations" because they're told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.

|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, as Kate and Humphrey's pups are snarky brats who ignore their parents' orders to stay home; they even try to justify this in the sixth movie by claiming they get into "situations" because they're told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.

|N/A (Direct to Video)

|N/A (Direct to Video)

|-

|-

|''Animal Farm''

|''Animal Farm''

|To debut in 2026

|2026

|PG

|PG

|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation for ''[[Animal Farm]]'' seems to go against a lot of what the original story stood for: becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman in this adaptation) serving as a blatant expy of Elon Musk, showing that the left has never forgiven Musk for teaming up with President Donald Trump. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism; while Orwell himself had criticisms of capitalism, the movie's message keeps getting hammered over the audience's head. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell "rolling in his grave."

|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation of ''[[Animal Farm]]'' goes against a lot of what the original story stood for, becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman in this adaptation) serving as a blatant expy of Elon Musk, showing that the left has never forgiven Musk for teaming up with President Donald Trump. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism; while Orwell himself had criticisms of capitalism, the movie's message keeps getting hammered over the audience's head. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell "rolling in his grave."

|TBA

|TBA

|-

|-

|2017

|2017

|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)

|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)

|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the "hero's journey" story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: the main teenager Alex can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, "Words aren't cool." Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony "Tony" Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; it gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ</ref> Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.

|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the "hero's journey" story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: the main teenager, Alex, can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, "Words aren't cool." Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony "Tony" Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; it gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ</ref> Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.

|$25,650,000

|$25,650,000

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|G

|G

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic," that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel - ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' - was released in 2021.

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic," that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel, ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'', was released in 2021.

|$146,983,492

|$146,983,492

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term "body positivity". This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed said character, the first time was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.

|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term "body positivity". This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed that character; the first was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.

|-

|-

|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')

|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')

|2022

|2022

|PG (should be PG-13)

|PG (should be PG-13)

|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and unsuitable themes for children. The movie even ends with Mei-Li blatantly telling her mother, "My panda, my choice," a slogan used by pro-abortionists.

|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and unsuitable themes for children. One of the most blatant themes of this film is a metaphor for menstruation, in which the women in Mei-Li's family turn into giant red pandas. The movie even ends with Mei-Li blatantly telling her mother, "My panda, my choice," a slogan used by pro-abortionists.

|$13.4 million

|$13.4 million

|-

|-