Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + +
liberal bias
That particular article series is well-done. I had a lot to do with it. "Impartiality" is not [[liberal bias]]. Pretending to be impartial while cherry-picking sources that support your own POV is the problem. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:07, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
That particular article series is well-done. I had a lot to do with it. "Impartiality" is not [[liberal bias]]. Pretending to be impartial while cherry-picking sources that support your own POV is the problem. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:07, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
==Wikipedia's bias==
I've tidied up the Wikipedia articles several times, but I saw today that the old liberal bias has crept back again. Jensen and also ''The Bell Curve'' are vilified, and Gould's POV is exalted. Gould puts words into others' mouths, and Wikipedia lets him get away with it. (I guess evolutionists like Gould can do no wrong, and conservatives can do no right, eh?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:33, 20 July 2007 (EDT)