Changes

no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:     
I love the idea of this essay.  Clearly there is a lot of judicial activism and legislating from the bench, and this is a great way to really highlight some of the more egregious decisions.  I've made an edit, which I hope is ok.  [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 01:34, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I love the idea of this essay.  Clearly there is a lot of judicial activism and legislating from the bench, and this is a great way to really highlight some of the more egregious decisions.  I've made an edit, which I hope is ok.  [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 01:34, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
==Worst?==
 +
 +
Shouldn't there be some sort of specified criteria as to what makes a case more bad than any other?  Additionally, shouldn't the facts be combined with the legal questions presented to educate the children viewing this site as to what would exactly make a court decision worse than any other?  This seems like nothing more than a cheap, political attack at an unfavorable opinion, not a legally erroneous one.  --[[User:TGlennRet|TGlennRet]] 01:36, 25 July 2007 (EDT)
11

edits