123
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 47:
Line 47: − + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Desk/Abuse (view source)
Revision as of 14:27, August 10, 2007
, 14:27, August 10, 2007→Deletion of article by Conservative
*This is not a debate site. If a senior editor says you were stacking the deck, I'm inclined to accept his judgment over yours. A possible rebuttal would have been, "But I included THIS for balance." Demanding "proof" is a sly way of shifting the burden.
*This is not a debate site. If a senior editor says you were stacking the deck, I'm inclined to accept his judgment over yours. A possible rebuttal would have been, "But I included THIS for balance." Demanding "proof" is a sly way of shifting the burden.
*All edits must be trustworthy, which means the burden of proof is on YOU. Poor edits will be removed. "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here." --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
*All edits must be trustworthy, which means the burden of proof is on YOU. Poor edits will be removed. "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here." --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:50, 8 August 2007 (EDT)\
::This is my final post on this matter. So far I have been told that my article "stinks", that I am a "whiner", that I stink like rotten cabbage (see marcaptan)and I have been blocked from editing for 3 days.
Ed - If you read through this entire discussion, my original rebuttal was that I in fact did include information for balance. I am only asking for proof from Conservative because the article was deleted so quickly that unfortunately, I can offer no proof myself. That seems to put the burden of proof on him.
I have reread the "Conservapedia Commandments" and as far as I can tell, I have not violated any of them either by the article that I wrote or by the entries that I have made on the debate pages. At the same time, I have been insulted and unfairly criticized. I say unfairly criticized because it is clear that no other sysops have even read my article but they have been quick to jump in and make declarations about the quality or content of it.
I guess thats all. Sincerely [[User:Wismike|Wismike]]
== Why don't you delete the recently added article about [[Woody Allen]]? ==
== Why don't you delete the recently added article about [[Woody Allen]]? ==
That article is just great. Really "nuanced". It is a shining example of a great contribution to this site. [[User:Wismike|Wismike]]
That article is just great. Really "nuanced". It is a shining example of a great contribution to this site. [[User:Wismike|Wismike]]