Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 51:
Line 51: − +
Talk:Chinese Communist Party (view source)
Revision as of 23:02, September 25, 2007
, 23:02, September 25, 2007Capitalism as a dirty word
Perhaps we should mention the drive towards capitalism in the last few decades within the party, without taking away from a focus on its horrible human rights record? [[User:Graham|Graham]] 17:53, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps we should mention the drive towards capitalism in the last few decades within the party, without taking away from a focus on its horrible human rights record? [[User:Graham|Graham]] 17:53, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:If you'll define "capitalism", we can discuss this. Were you referring in any way to [[free market]] economics? You know, the system in which buyers and sellers are permitted to come to mutually satisfactory arrangements without government interference. Let's say you want to sell your car for $2,000 and I agree. What business is that of the government? (And would you call that ''Capitalism'' as if to brand it with a dirty word, or would you call that economic freedom? It's a [[win-win]] deal for both parties. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:01, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:If you'll define "capitalism", we can discuss this. Were you referring in any way to [[free market]] economics? You know, the system in which buyers and sellers are permitted to come to mutually satisfactory arrangements without government interference. Let's say you want to sell your car for $2,000 and I agree. What business is that of the government? (And would you call that [[Capitalism]] as if to brand it with a dirty word, or would you call that economic freedom? It's a [[win-win]] deal for both parties. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:01, 25 September 2007 (EDT)