6
edits
Changes
no edit summary
==Revert of Edit copied from wikipedia==
I'd like to quote from the [http://www.thestar.com/article/190501 recent internet article] from the Toronto Star, in particular, the point where it is talking aobut copyright:
Schlafly says his site simply hasn't yet decided on its copyright rules, but adds, "We support broad reuse of our material in a manner similar to Wikipedia."
By copying (i.e. broadly reusing) the material in wikipedia it does not flaunt Wikipedia's copyright laws, and neither does it flaunt Conservapedia's.
I would also like to commend the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying Wikipedia:Verbatim Copying] for your further Reading into this matter.
Many thanks --[[User:Xsophos|Xsophos]] 03:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
I'd like to quote from the [http://www.thestar.com/article/190501 recent internet article] from the Toronto Star, in particular, the point where it is talking aobut copyright:
Schlafly says his site simply hasn't yet decided on its copyright rules, but adds, "We support broad reuse of our material in a manner similar to Wikipedia."
By copying (i.e. broadly reusing) the material in wikipedia it does not flaunt Wikipedia's copyright laws, and neither does it flaunt Conservapedia's.
I would also like to commend the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying Wikipedia:Verbatim Copying] for your further Reading into this matter.
Many thanks --[[User:Xsophos|Xsophos]] 03:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)