Talk:Rome

Revert of Edit copied from wikipedia

I'd like to quote from the recent internet article from the Toronto Star, in particular, the point where it is talking aobut copyright:

Schlafly says his site simply hasn't yet decided on its copyright rules, but adds, "We support broad reuse of our material in a manner similar to Wikipedia."

By copying (i.e. broadly reusing) the material in wikipedia it does not flaunt Wikipedia's copyright laws, and neither does it flaunt Conservapedia's.

I would also like to commend the article Wikipedia:Verbatim Copying for your further Reading into this matter.

Many thanks --Xsophos 03:10, 14 March 2007 (EDT)