Changes

no edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:     
Either Engel v. Vitale or Stone v. Graham. They both involve religion in public schools almost redundantly. I believe that Plyler v. Doe should be placed very high as it is used as a precedent to strengthen the foothold of illegal immigrants in other instances as well. It also costs taxpayers billions. [[User:Lukecorlando|Lukecorlando]]
 
Either Engel v. Vitale or Stone v. Graham. They both involve religion in public schools almost redundantly. I believe that Plyler v. Doe should be placed very high as it is used as a precedent to strengthen the foothold of illegal immigrants in other instances as well. It also costs taxpayers billions. [[User:Lukecorlando|Lukecorlando]]
 +
 +
 +
I am curious as to how Schlafly justifies his failure to include Plessy in this list and his decision to include Cooper, which was an enforcement Brown v. Board.--[[User:Laches|Laches]] 16:40, 30 November 2007 (EST)
36

edits