308
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: +
Talk:Essay:25 Worst Court Decisions (view source)
Revision as of 12:57, November 21, 2007
, 12:57, November 21, 2007→Epperson v. Arkansas
The decision in that case was not "evolution ''has'' to be taught", it was that you could not legally ban evolution from being taught in a public school setting. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:03, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
The decision in that case was not "evolution ''has'' to be taught", it was that you could not legally ban evolution from being taught in a public school setting. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:03, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
:Now I see that you're trying to condemn the case by condemning the justice who wrote the decision. This is a simple ''ad hominem'' attack, and is thus not a valid arguement. Also, the decision is still mischaracterized—see above. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 07:57, 21 November 2007 (EST)
==Worst Case==
==Worst Case==