nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW
949
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + +
Talk:Essay:25 Worst Court Decisions (view source)
Revision as of 02:26, November 5, 2007
, 02:26, November 5, 2007→Worst Case
: What decision should we take out to make room for it? Some have suggested reducing the duplicate-issue cases. Perhaps we have we could swap out one of the Establishment Clause cases, for example. You choose. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:10, 4 November 2007 (EST)
: What decision should we take out to make room for it? Some have suggested reducing the duplicate-issue cases. Perhaps we have we could swap out one of the Establishment Clause cases, for example. You choose. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:10, 4 November 2007 (EST)
Either Engel v. Vitale or Stone v. Graham. They both involve religion in public schools almost redundantly. I believe that Plyler v. Doe should be placed very high as it is used as a precedent to strengthen the foothold of illegal immigrants in other instances as well. It also costs taxpayers billions. [[User:Lukecorlando|Lukecorlando]]