23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
It is a logical inconsistancy to claim that foreknowledge of an individual's actions allows that individual to possess free will. If the will is known, it is not free. If the will is free, it cannot be known.
Thus, if a deity has foreknowledge of an individual's actions, then that deity has denied the individual's free will.
If an individual's will is genuinely free, then any claim that a deity can have prior knowledge of an individual's actions is false.
''Free will'' and ''an omniscient deity'' are mutually exclusive. If either is encompassed by a theologically honest position, the other must be denied. --[[User:OmnusErudito|OmnusErudito]] 14:24, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Thus, if a deity has foreknowledge of an individual's actions, then that deity has denied the individual's free will.
If an individual's will is genuinely free, then any claim that a deity can have prior knowledge of an individual's actions is false.
''Free will'' and ''an omniscient deity'' are mutually exclusive. If either is encompassed by a theologically honest position, the other must be denied. --[[User:OmnusErudito|OmnusErudito]] 14:24, 14 March 2007 (EDT)