nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: +
User talk:Puellanivis (view source)
Revision as of 08:33, December 20, 2007
, 08:33, December 20, 2007→90/10 Rule
:I am making positive article contributions, look at [[Theory of Relativity]], the number of vandalisms that I have reverted. I am a valuable resource to CP, and I do, and will continue to make positive article contributions. That I take a short detour and discuss an issue directly concerning CP, no less in CP's favor, should be recognized as entirely acceptable. As well, a number of talk page edits I have made were in response to vandalism, or improper usernames, as I do not have the ability, like admins and sysops do, to simply ban them, and/or delete the vandal's page, if need be. Please look at [[Special:Contributions/Aschlafly]] in order to see the article to talk ratio of the founder of the site. I'll let you know that it's in violation of 90/10, however as an incredibly positive force for CP, there is absolutely no reason to ban him. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 14:36, 19 December 2007 (EST)
:I am making positive article contributions, look at [[Theory of Relativity]], the number of vandalisms that I have reverted. I am a valuable resource to CP, and I do, and will continue to make positive article contributions. That I take a short detour and discuss an issue directly concerning CP, no less in CP's favor, should be recognized as entirely acceptable. As well, a number of talk page edits I have made were in response to vandalism, or improper usernames, as I do not have the ability, like admins and sysops do, to simply ban them, and/or delete the vandal's page, if need be. Please look at [[Special:Contributions/Aschlafly]] in order to see the article to talk ratio of the founder of the site. I'll let you know that it's in violation of 90/10, however as an incredibly positive force for CP, there is absolutely no reason to ban him. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 14:36, 19 December 2007 (EST)
::Just looking at the numbers of edits[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Puellanivis], Puellanivis is not in violation of the 90/10 rule. 50% of his total edits are in mainspace, and last time I checked 50% was greater than 10%! Andy is not in violation either.[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Aschlafly] [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:05, 19 December 2007 (EST)
::Just looking at the numbers of edits[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Puellanivis], Puellanivis is not in violation of the 90/10 rule. 50% of his total edits are in mainspace, and last time I checked 50% was greater than 10%! Andy is not in violation either.[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Aschlafly] [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:05, 19 December 2007 (EST)
:::A little trick I've learned in life is to never trust summary screens when the data can be personally viewed. Do debate articles count in mainspace? I reviewed the data myself before making my assessment including looking at the quality of edits to actual articles. For instance his reverting Andy here [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_relativity&diff=prev&oldid=354658] counts as a mainspace edit, but I didn't count it as such. I was looking specifically for new information added by the user, and found it to be wanting. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:33, 20 December 2007 (EST)