Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Archaeopteryx (view source)

Revision as of 14:23, January 3, 2008

304 bytes added ,  14:23, January 3, 2008
reply
Line 154: Line 154:  
# Further evidence that Hoyle didn't have available is at least a big part of the answer, if not the whole answer.  Even if he made no mistakes, this further evidence shows that Hoyle's conclusion was incorrect.
 
# Further evidence that Hoyle didn't have available is at least a big part of the answer, if not the whole answer.  Even if he made no mistakes, this further evidence shows that Hoyle's conclusion was incorrect.
 
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:05, 3 January 2008 (EST)
 
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:05, 3 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
: It wasn't just Hoyle, though he's impressive enough alone.  It was a team of scientists who examined the specimens firsthand.  Have their critics done that?  I'm open to valid, meaningful criticisms of their findings, but I don't see any yet.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:23, 3 January 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,911

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/363440"

Navigation menu