Changes

==Religious Response==

==Religious Response==

Online Christian criticism brands the trilogy overly [[atheist]] [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58341], [[pantheism|pantheist]] [http://www.facingthechallenge.org/pullman.php], or [[humanist]] [http://literarycatechist.blogspot.com/2007/11/his-dark-materials.html]. It has also come under heavy fire from several [[Christian]] groups, most famously the Catholic League, who called for a Christian boycott of the film adaptation. [http://catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=2007&month=October&read=2322].

Online Christian criticism brands the trilogy overly [[atheist]],<ref>[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58341]</ref> [[pantheism|pantheist]]<ref>[http://www.facingthechallenge.org/pullman.php]</ref> or [[humanist]].[http://literarycatechist.blogspot.com/2007/11/his-dark-materials.html]</ref> It has also come under heavy fire from several [[Christian]] groups, most famously the Catholic League, who called for a Christian boycott of the film adaptation.<ref>[http://catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=2007&month=October&read=2322]</ref>

There are some Christian supporters of the books, most notably Rowan Williams, the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]]. [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2004/03/17/bodark17.xml]

There are some Christian supporters of the books, most notably Rowan Williams, the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]].<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2004/03/17/bodark17.xml]</ref>

==References==

==References==