348
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Contest4 (view source)
Revision as of 15:27, January 12, 2008
, 15:27, January 12, 2008→Scoring Examples
:I'd say that the entire group of definitions should be assembled into a one-page [[glossary]] (with redirects from each term). Or maybe the glossary itself should judged the same as any other article. I don't think each glossary entry should stand alone, and I don't think players should get even 1 point for creating a page simply by pasting something. I could write a computer program to do that (in fact I have started to design it already). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:32, 12 January 2008 (EST)
:I'd say that the entire group of definitions should be assembled into a one-page [[glossary]] (with redirects from each term). Or maybe the glossary itself should judged the same as any other article. I don't think each glossary entry should stand alone, and I don't think players should get even 1 point for creating a page simply by pasting something. I could write a computer program to do that (in fact I have started to design it already). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:32, 12 January 2008 (EST)
::I'm going to stick my neck out, a bit too far, perhaps, and suggest that copy and pasted entries not count as ''anything'', or perhaps 0.5 points, 1 at most. Of course, the former is the most optimal. --[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 10:27, 12 January 2008 (EST)
==== Copy & Pasted pages ====
==== Copy & Pasted pages ====