Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 60:
Line 60: + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Contest4 (view source)
Revision as of 14:32, January 12, 2008
, 14:32, January 12, 2008→Scoring Examples: pasting is too easy, shouldn't generate huge scores
====Scoring Examples====
====Scoring Examples====
Perhaps we should have links "guideline" articles which meet the minimum qualifications for each level. This way there would be something specific to look at when there are questions. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:15, 7 January 2008 (EST)
Perhaps we should have links "guideline" articles which meet the minimum qualifications for each level. This way there would be something specific to look at when there are questions. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:15, 7 January 2008 (EST)
:Could the judges review '''each''' players claimed credits every day? This would ensure that no one can make mistakes or use a strange interpretation of the rules to gain advantage. Remember last time, when somebody just did a copy and paste of several hundred short definitions?
:I'd say that the entire group of definitions should be assembled into a one-page [[glossary]] (with redirects from each term). Or maybe the glossary itself should judged the same as any other article. I don't think each glossary entry should stand alone, and I don't think players should get even 1 point for creating a page simply by pasting something. I could write a computer program to do that (in fact I have started to design it already). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:32, 12 January 2008 (EST)
==== Copy & Pasted pages ====
==== Copy & Pasted pages ====