Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Contest4 (view source)
Revision as of 14:25, January 12, 2008
, 14:25, January 12, 2008→Wanted Pages Rule: my 2 cents
: Personally, I don't think it's necessary. It is understood at this point what a wanted page is and the honor system should suffice. The difficulty last time was with a concerted effort to bend the rules. With the spirit of the contest being more clear this time, I don't think you would run into the same issues. Treat everyone like trusted positive contributors, and chances are they will live up to your expectations. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:51, 10 January 2008 (EST)
: Personally, I don't think it's necessary. It is understood at this point what a wanted page is and the honor system should suffice. The difficulty last time was with a concerted effort to bend the rules. With the spirit of the contest being more clear this time, I don't think you would run into the same issues. Treat everyone like trusted positive contributors, and chances are they will live up to your expectations. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:51, 10 January 2008 (EST)
::I intend to claim credit for any new "wanted entries" which spring into being because they are legitimately linked.
::If anyone can claim credit for "wikifying" an article, and any of their links push 3-link page over the line (so it becomes a 4-link page), then I would think this has now become a legitimate "most wanted" page.
::Otherwise, I'd prefer to see a manually-created list of desired articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:25, 12 January 2008 (EST)
====Scoring Examples====
====Scoring Examples====