Changes

6 bytes removed ,  03:11, January 14, 2008
italics, not bold
Line 1: Line 1: −
In '''''Stump v. Sparkman''''', 435 U.S. 349 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[absolute judicial immunity]] applies to protect a decision by state [[judge]] to authorize the forced [[sterilization]] of a low-IQ girl without her consent or knowledge.  She was told she was having an [[appendectomy]].
+
In ''Stump v. Sparkman'', 435 U.S. 349 (1978), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that [[absolute judicial immunity]] applies to protect a decision by state [[judge]] to authorize the forced [[sterilization]] of a low-IQ girl without her consent or knowledge.  She was told she was having an [[appendectomy]].
    
Justice [[Byron White]] wrote the opinion for the 5-3 Court, and was joined by Justice [[William Rehnquist]], Chief Justice [[Warren Burger]] and others.  Justices [[Lewis Powell]], [[Potter Stewart]] and [[Thurgood Marshall]] dissented.
 
Justice [[Byron White]] wrote the opinion for the 5-3 Court, and was joined by Justice [[William Rehnquist]], Chief Justice [[Warren Burger]] and others.  Justices [[Lewis Powell]], [[Potter Stewart]] and [[Thurgood Marshall]] dissented.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,256

edits