Changes

716 bytes added , 23:37, January 14, 2008

New page: In ''Darlak v. Bobear'', 814 F.2d 1055, 1061 (5th Cir. 1987), a physician who was suspended from a state hospital sued state officials under Section 1983, and requested that the hospit...

In ''Darlak v. Bobear'', 814 F.2d 1055, 1061 (5th Cir. 1987), a physician who was suspended from a state hospital sued state officials under [[Section 1983]], and requested that the hospital rescind his suspension. The court held that plaintiff's claim was one for prospective injunctive relief, and was therefore not barred by the [[Eleventh Amendment]]. ''Id.'' at 1061. ''See also'' M. Schwartz & J. Kirklin, Section 1983 Litigation: Claims, Defenses and Fees -- 1989 Cumulative Supplement No. 1 § 6.5 (1989) (numerous cases cited, holding that reinstatement of public employees is prospective rather than retroactive relief).
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
[[category:Section 1983]]
[[category:Eleventh Amendment]]

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,506

edits

Changes

Darlak v. Bobear (view source)

Revision as of 23:37, January 14, 2008