nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 258:
Line 258: + + + +
Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces (view source)
Revision as of 21:57, March 17, 2008
, 21:57, March 17, 2008→Edit war
The issue is about what "fully patched" (from the second paragraph of [http://www.ccgr.org/computer/left-behind-tribulation-forces.html this reference]) means in regards to the game. I have taken the plain, straight-forward English position (which the vast majority of average readers will understand) that "fully patched" means "fully patched" while Urushie apparently thinks (and I've never seen him say otherwise) that "fully patched" means "not fully patched." He has tried to argue that since hackers created a security breach in a fully patched version of Windows that means that "fully patched" doesn't mean "fully patched" in all instances, and ignoring the painfully obvious and insurmountable difference between people deliberately hacking Windows to create problems and a game which people aren't trying to hack into. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 17:40, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
The issue is about what "fully patched" (from the second paragraph of [http://www.ccgr.org/computer/left-behind-tribulation-forces.html this reference]) means in regards to the game. I have taken the plain, straight-forward English position (which the vast majority of average readers will understand) that "fully patched" means "fully patched" while Urushie apparently thinks (and I've never seen him say otherwise) that "fully patched" means "not fully patched." He has tried to argue that since hackers created a security breach in a fully patched version of Windows that means that "fully patched" doesn't mean "fully patched" in all instances, and ignoring the painfully obvious and insurmountable difference between people deliberately hacking Windows to create problems and a game which people aren't trying to hack into. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 17:40, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
I am suggesting a rewrite of the reviews section. I also notice that information in the reviews section about the game is not included elsewhere, such as using actual images and logos from New York City. Factual information about the game should never first appear under the reviews area.
The reviews are pertinent, but we have references for them if people want to check them up. It is understood that initial versions will have bugs that need to be addressed, but that should not be the focus. The focus should be on how the game plays after the fixes. On a different note, fully patched does not mean that all greivances ever brought up about the game have been solved. The developers of the game would not even have any way of knowing all of those greivances. It does mean that playability issues as presented in the patch documentation have been resolved. It should also be pointed out that some of the greivances raised against the game are ideological or differences of opinion in what makes a fun game. People who want a shoot 'em up will not be happy with Left Behind: Eternal Forces, nor should an effort be made to make them happy. Our article should report about the game and what it is as the focus. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:57, 17 March 2008 (EDT)