203
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 268:
Line 268: + +
Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces (view source)
Revision as of 00:52, March 18, 2008
, 00:52, March 18, 2008→Edit war
:PS: Jinx, you say the "plain, straight-forward" definition is that fully patched means nothing left is wrong, and I would disagree. Fully patched means, especially in this context, that all of the current patches have been applied, not that there are no more holes which need a patch. The hacking analogy might be erroneous (and I'm not saying that it is), but this doesn't mean necesessarily that his conclusion is erronious. I'm afraid I still don't see how this fits in to the entire article, though. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:10, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
:PS: Jinx, you say the "plain, straight-forward" definition is that fully patched means nothing left is wrong, and I would disagree. Fully patched means, especially in this context, that all of the current patches have been applied, not that there are no more holes which need a patch. The hacking analogy might be erroneous (and I'm not saying that it is), but this doesn't mean necesessarily that his conclusion is erronious. I'm afraid I still don't see how this fits in to the entire article, though. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:10, 17 March 2008 (EDT)
::In short, it's a very minor point in the article, which is why I have zero objections to it being removed entirely. I have been trying to bring some balance to the 'Reviews' section (as, in it's original form, it seemed to imply that all the negative reviews were down to 'religious bias'), and Jinx has been very grudgingly giving ground when he's been more or less forced to. For some reason, though, he has dug his heels firmly in, and refuses to budge on this, and wants to claim that there are no issues or complaints raised by the reviews that haven't been patched, despite simply looking at the reviews referenced within the article and comparing that with the list of fixes in the patchnotes (also referenced within the article) indicates this is simply not the case. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 20:52, 17 March 2008 (EDT)