Changes

Temp moved here, but really should be incorporated as a section on the use of art as propaganda , or in a propaganda article. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 13:06, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

Temp moved here, but really should be incorporated as a section on the use of art as propaganda , or in a propaganda article. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 13:06, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

:I'll make the same protests I made before it was moved. The section is in poor form for an encyclopedia. There's no attribution for the opinion, and no citations for the facts. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:05, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

:I'll make the same protests I made before it was moved. The section is in poor form for an encyclopedia. There's no attribution for the opinion, and no citations for the facts. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:05, 17 March 2008 (EDT)

::As usual I'll try to point out the obvious. <Sigh> ALL art is to bring across the artists message. The great religious painters were inspired by their faith (and I don't care what [[Dan Brown]] says). ''hoping to gain '''extra protection''' for their political speech

::As usual I'll try to point out the obvious. <Sigh> ALL art is to bring across the artists message. The great religious painters were inspired by their faith (and I don't care what [[Dan Brown]] says).  

:: Just asking, but extra protection from what? Public outrage? Claiming it's art rarely overrides others personal tastes. The Law? [[First Amendment]] covers all revolting things, '''as it well should.''' (I once heard an intresting thought: Free speech is for <expletive>, nice people usually don't need it's protection)

::''hoping to gain '''extra protection''' for their political speech'' Just asking, but extra protection from what? Public outrage? Claiming it's art rarely overrides others personal tastes. The Law? [[First Amendment]] covers all revolting things, '''as it well should.''' (I once heard an intresting thought: Free speech is for <expletive>, nice people usually don't need it's protection)

::Were you maybe trying to hint at NEA grants? If so please be more clear. (BTW, I also think the NEA shouldn't give money to these hacks). [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 10:45, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

::Were you maybe trying to hint at NEA grants? If so please be more clear. (BTW, I also think the NEA shouldn't give money to these hacks). [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 10:45, 18 March 2008 (EDT)