1,513
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Why is the whole of the "Creationary view" section taken up with creationist critiques of the dinosaur-to-bird hypothesis rather than positive evidence for the "creationary" version of the origin of birds? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Why is the whole of the "Creationary view" section taken up with creationist critiques of the dinosaur-to-bird hypothesis rather than positive evidence for the "creationary" version of the origin of birds? [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
: Probably because nobody's yet written that part. Are you offering? Actually, I think the section is a bit inaccurate in that perhaps only the first quote is to do with dinosaur-to-bird evolution, and the other two are to do with bird evolution regardless of whether it was from dinosaurs. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:17, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
: Probably because nobody's yet written that part. Are you offering? Actually, I think the section is a bit inaccurate in that perhaps only the first quote is to do with dinosaur-to-bird evolution, and the other two are to do with bird evolution regardless of whether it was from dinosaurs. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:17, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
::No, not offering to write it. Because I don't take a "creationary view" of things, I'm really not qualified. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 10:52, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
==I'm sorry, but...==
==I'm sorry, but...==