Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
342 bytes added ,  14:33, March 16, 2007
Good point
Line 10: Line 10:     
The article says "as the prize was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II" but does not state *why* they should have received the prize, or even which Nobel Prize.
 
The article says "as the prize was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II" but does not state *why* they should have received the prize, or even which Nobel Prize.
 +
 +
:Hm, good point. I'll see if I can dig out what this sentence is based on. For now, the stub note and the fact tags are enough to say "This article should be taken with a grain of salt", but you are of course correct, and the sentence should go if it can't be backed and/or explained. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 10:33, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
1,767

edits

Navigation menu