| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | * exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> | | * exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> |
| | * downplay, and omit from the conclusion and abstract, significant medical harms found in the study among post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> | | * downplay, and omit from the conclusion and abstract, significant medical harms found in the study among post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> |
| − | * be silent when newspapers exaggerate the misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> | + | * be silent when newspapers predictably exaggerate and misreport the findings of the paper<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref> |
| | * in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion</ref> | | * in imitation of [[Hitler]]'s attempt to discredit [[Einstein]],<ref>http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf</ref> invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion</ref> |
| | * use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref> | | * use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results<ref>See, e.g., [[Harvard abortion study]]</ref> |