Changes

no edit summary
Line 116: Line 116:  
Thanks for the rational reply Phillip. I will drop this matter now, having got a well thought out answer such as yours but before I do my I just say that I dont believe there is an english speaking country (I have been all over the world) where the word f*** is acceptable. There is nothing borderline about it and as Andy harps on about this being a clean, high quality resource I thought more would be done about it. You sysops need to set the example. I will settle the matter now but I do not wish to see anymore swearing.
 
Thanks for the rational reply Phillip. I will drop this matter now, having got a well thought out answer such as yours but before I do my I just say that I dont believe there is an english speaking country (I have been all over the world) where the word f*** is acceptable. There is nothing borderline about it and as Andy harps on about this being a clean, high quality resource I thought more would be done about it. You sysops need to set the example. I will settle the matter now but I do not wish to see anymore swearing.
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 14:06, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 14:06, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Ed Poor Behavior==
 +
I would like to complain about my recent block from Edpoor.... The block reason states that I was blocked for [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:DrCB insult] But [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ADrCB&diff=423551&oldid=422078 this] message shows another motive.  I was blocked because I "insulted" Edpoor's friend TK.  The edit in question is [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Europeanunion&diff=prev&oldid=421684 this message] to a user.  I simply stated my opinion.  I did not "insult" TK.  Also, I find the very flimsy excuse of "last dozen or so contributions (being) talk" as thinly veiled at best.  I sent the sysop the following message  via email:
 +
 +
    Please forgive me if this is comes across as hostile, it's not meant to...
 +
    But I feel you are mistaken. Of my 20 posts this site, they are categorized
 +
    as the following:
 +
  *2 Changes to my user page
 +
  *2 changes to the Al Franken page (one which is simply correcting a typo I
 +
      missed)
 +
  *6 Changes to Main page talk
 +
  *1 Message to Mr Schlafly
 +
  *2 Messages to Crocite pointing out a violation of rules
 +
  *2 Posts to the Bob Jones University Page (again, one correction of a
 +
      mistake)
 +
  *1 Message to Bohdan asking about how things work here
 +
  *1 Post to the Marijuana talk page to request a change (the page is blocked)
 +
  *1 Change to the Schlockumentary page (removing red links)
 +
  *1 Changes to the Lawrence V Texas page where I added a brand new summary to
 +
    the top of the article for clarity and 1 message to EuropeanUnion
 +
    The last post is obviously the one I got blocked for, and forgive me saying
 +
    this... But that is completely hypocritical. I simply expressed my opinion
 +
    to another user, I didn't broadcast it on the main page, I didn't insult TK
 +
    on his userpage, I simply offered advice to a new user.
 +
   
 +
I would also like to say, Sir, that I find it funny that I'm getting blocked
 +
for insulting TK when he himself as given free run to insult and patronize
 +
anyone he gets the urge to. As I look at other postings, I find it clear
 +
that you are friends, but I don't think revenge blocks because someone posts
 +
something bad about one of your friends is very democratic.</blockquote>
 +
 +
The response I got, in my opinion, reveals the motives even more:
 +
 +
    "In other words, you're prepared to take it back and apologize if reinstated?
 +
    Uncle Ed"
 +
 +
To which I responded:
 +
 +
    "Under no circumstances. I have done nothing wrong here.  I simply gave another user an
 +
    honest example of my opinion as regarding another user.  I see no reason to apologize.  My
 +
    last dozen edits were not all talk.  As a matter of fact, even when you take out the
 +
    doubles for correction and leave the non-talk talk posts, my posts are 5/20 or 25% main
 +
    space edits.  I would rather sit out the three days that give in to the fact that TK is
 +
    invincible and can do what he pleases but if another user says anything unflattering about
 +
    him they get blocked."</blockquote>
 +
 +
I'm appalled at the blatant abuse of sysop power.  I was told that this was the formal page to complain about such matters and thought I would leave my messages here.  If there are any questions, feel free to leave them here or contact me through my email, which is enabled. Thank you [[User:DrCB|Doctor CB]][[User_Talk:DrCB|<sup>The Doctor is In</sup>]] 00:14, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
75

edits