Changes

2 bytes removed , 06:54, April 14, 2008

m

New topics go at the end.

Line 1: Line 1: −

~~==Preaching is a "science"==~~

−

At the risk of 90/10 repercussions, I have re re-edited back to my original word '''''science''''' in the opening statement on the '''Preachology''' article. Preaching would be classified as a social science. The effects of preaching can be measured. A study was conducted within a Church congregation on the effects of preaching, The eighty two participants were tested in five categories: knowledge, pseudo-behavior, a subjective evaluation on the participant's act of worship, a subjective evaluation of the preacher, and semantic differential. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1386252][[User:Wired4jesus|Wired4jesus]] 00:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

−

==Small Talk==

Is it April 1 already? [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 09:38, 31 March 2008 (EDT)

Line 14: Line 8:

::By all means, if you have no Uncle Sam, than don't send him any money. Unless of course it is April 1st, and then just send it to me. [[User:Wired4jesus|Wired4jesus]] 01:44, 12 April 2008 (EDT)

+

==Preaching is a "science"==

+

At the risk of 90/10 repercussions, I have re re-edited back to my original word '''''science''''' in the opening statement on the '''Preachology''' article. Preaching would be classified as a social science. The effects of preaching can be measured. A study was conducted within a Church congregation on the effects of preaching, The eighty two participants were tested in five categories: knowledge, pseudo-behavior, a subjective evaluation on the participant's act of worship, a subjective evaluation of the preacher, and semantic differential. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1386252][[User:Wired4jesus|Wired4jesus]] 00:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT)

Philip J. Rayment

nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW

13,254

edits

Changes

Talk:Preachology (view source)

Revision as of 06:54, April 14, 2008