| − | Ed - regarding your pulling of the Time magazine review, that the fact that ID is explained on the website isn't a good reason to pull the reviewers comment. The movie should stand or fall on its own merits, as that's all the viewer's going to see. So while I've removed the inflammatory section you objected to, I'd ask that it be put back in - or any other quotes from any of the reviews, in fact. These reporters are mostly the movie critics of their publications, and it's only fair to hear their comments on the movie itself, even if we don't agree with them. [[User:MakeTime|MakeTime]] 21:07, 17 April 2008 (EDT) | + | Ed - regarding your pulling of the Time magazine review, that the fact that ID is explained on the website isn't a good reason to pull the reviewers comment. The movie should stand or fall on its own merits, as that's all the viewer's going to see. So while I've removed the inflammatory section you objected to, I'd ask that it be put back in - or any other quotes from any of the reviews, in fact. These reporters are mostly the movie critics of their publications, and it's only fair to hear their comments on the movie itself, even if we don't agree with them - remember, this is only a movie, and even if you like the premise it tries to lay out,you still can object to the movie, as a movie. [[User:MakeTime|MakeTime]] 21:07, 17 April 2008 (EDT) |