Changes

608 bytes added , 13:50, April 20, 2008

building library

In ''Nasir v. Morgan'', 350 F.3d 366 (3d Cir. 2003), the Court of Appeals for the [[Third Circuit]] upheld a ban on correspondence by inmates with former inmates. The Court rejected a [[First Amendment]] challenge to that rule, noting that the ban was justified by security issues.

This decision is often cited for its statement that an appellate court will uphold a district court's grant of a summary judgment motion on any basis so long as that basis was previously presented to the district court. ''Id.'' at 368.
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
[[category:First Amendment]]
[[category:Appellate Procedure]]

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,357

edits

Changes

Nasir v. Morgan (view source)

Revision as of 13:50, April 20, 2008