121
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 44:
Line 44: − +
Debate:Why is there something rather than nothing? (view source)
Revision as of 19:53, May 16, 2008
, 19:53, May 16, 2008→Yes: Nobody expects the GRAMMOR inquisition!
== Yes ==
== Yes ==
There is no concrete proof that there is something, everything here ''could'' not exist. We assume that there is something from the unproved axiom "I think, therefore I am." Axioms by definition cannot be proven true or false, there just assumptions. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 15:53, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
There is no concrete proof that there is something, everything here ''could'' not exist. We assume that there is something from the unproved axiom "I think, therefore I am." Axioms by definition cannot be proven true or false, they are just assumptions. --[[User:Capercorn]] <small> [[User Talk:Capercorn|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Capercorn|contribs]] </small> 15:53, 16 May 2008 (EDT)