Changes

:Mr. Jinxmchue: Based on my past experience with your editing and opinions, I will simply discount your initial observation and not take your rejection as the final word.  Another word on your skills as an editor, you may take this as an observation.  Every paragraph has a reference.  The primary references for the first six paragraphs are to the PDF transcript of the official ruling of Judge Jones which is posted at the NCSE.  If fact, the NSCE has many documents from the trial, all posted unedited and without editorial comment.  So you see, the only primary resource I used from the NCSE concerned their research into creationism and this was the You Tube interview that was posted at the end of the article.  Even a cursory reading of the article and references will show just about the entire article is written using the December 20, 2005 ruling.  All other references were added to list the law firms involved with the trial.  Using the KKK as a means to criticize my references is juvenile, but if you insist on using such ad hominid comments, I can't stop you.  

:Mr. Jinxmchue: Based on my past experience with your editing and opinions, I will simply discount your initial observation and not take your rejection as the final word.  Another word on your skills as an editor, you may take this as an observation.  Every paragraph has a reference.  The primary references for the first six paragraphs are to the PDF transcript of the official ruling of Judge Jones which is posted at the NCSE.  If fact, the NSCE has many documents from the trial, all posted unedited and without editorial comment.  So you see, the only primary resource I used from the NCSE concerned their research into creationism and this was the You Tube interview that was posted at the end of the article.  Even a cursory reading of the article and references will show just about the entire article is written using the December 20, 2005 ruling.  All other references were added to list the law firms involved with the trial.  Using the KKK as a means to criticize my references is juvenile, but if you insist on using such ad hominem comments, I can't stop you.  

:This being said, I feel that this version is not as good as my previous effort.  If anyone would like to add constructive editing or suggestions, that would be nice. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 11:14, 26 May 2008 (EDT)

:This being said, I feel that this version is not as good as my previous effort.  If anyone would like to add constructive editing or suggestions, that would be nice. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 11:14, 26 May 2008 (EDT)