Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
please get started
:::Writing plan, eh? Okay. Here's the issue, I admit that the definition I was using was not the most useful in this context, and might only be applicable to a rather obscure and narrow section of the population (masters with commercial licenses from the coast guard). While it is a technical definition, I don't think it is the most useful, and probably shouldn't be the one exclusively used in an article on that title. Had I thought about it a bit more when writing the article, I should have just said "[[inlet]]". How about I write an [[inlet]] article, and mention the inland master's license within that? I think it would be more useful that way. What do you think? [[User:Jaguar|Jaguar]] 13:55, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
:::Writing plan, eh? Okay. Here's the issue, I admit that the definition I was using was not the most useful in this context, and might only be applicable to a rather obscure and narrow section of the population (masters with commercial licenses from the coast guard). While it is a technical definition, I don't think it is the most useful, and probably shouldn't be the one exclusively used in an article on that title. Had I thought about it a bit more when writing the article, I should have just said "[[inlet]]". How about I write an [[inlet]] article, and mention the inland master's license within that? I think it would be more useful that way. What do you think? [[User:Jaguar|Jaguar]] 13:55, 27 May 2008 (EDT)
::Write it as "[[inland water]]", distinguishing it from landlocked bodies of water such as lakes. Compare it to bays like the [[Hudson Bay]] up in Canada, as well as the [[Great Lakes]]. Or '''are''' the Great Lakes inland waters? Then I'll 'move' the article to [[inlet]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:24, 27 May 2008 (EDT)