300
edits
Changes
Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 23:20, June 1, 2008
, 23:20, June 1, 2008Liberal Fluff?
Philip: The quote box for the disclaimer looks good, thanks. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 15:53, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
Philip: The quote box for the disclaimer looks good, thanks. --[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 15:53, 1 June 2008 (EDT)
==Questions concerning Aschlafly's edit==
Mr. Schlafly: in my opinion your edit has introduced an unreferenced opinion and removed important facts that contributed to the credibility of this article. Every major edit I made to this article was discussed beforehand and I even made every change you required, yet here you are deleting important facts that give a certain measure of comprehension to the Kitzmiller v Dover lawsuit. I'd like to know why the following changes were made.
*Why was the sentence concerning Tammy Kitzmiller and the ten other parents that were a part of the lawsuit removed?
*Why was the $2 million sum mentioned prior to the verdict and why was it not mentioned that the payment of fees was reduced to $1 million?
*Why was mention of the lead law firm, Pepper Hamilton LLP, removed?
*Why was the legal reasoning the judge employed in his verdict removed? Shouldn't his reasoning involving the establishment clause, Lemon Test, other opinions about creationism, and the opinions of other jurists be included?
*The idea that the parents sued to "censor any mention of intelligent design in public school" is without merit. If I am wrong I'm sure you could provide the reference that is required by the commandments.
Your removal of "liberal fluff" was nothing more that the removal of factual information. It has been said the facts have a liberal bias, even if that is so; it shouldn't be a barrier for adding pertinent information.