nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Talk:Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District (view source)
Revision as of 15:42, June 2, 2008
, 15:42, June 2, 2008→Type of article: Clarifying Andy's response.
: A reader should be able, based on the first 100 or so words, to understand the significance of the outcome of the case. I don't mind fluff later in the entry, but it should not obscure the essence that needs to be on the first page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
: A reader should be able, based on the first 100 or so words, to understand the significance of the outcome of the case. I don't mind fluff later in the entry, but it should not obscure the essence that needs to be on the first page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:23, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
:# So you seem to be saying that this one article can cover both the legal and the wider social aspects.
:# And you agree that what you call "fluff" that you removed can go in the article after all, but not near the beginning. That's pretty much what I suggested earlier.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:42, 2 June 2008 (EDT)