Changes

Line 58: Line 58:  
:I haven't read the book, but it seems from that sentence alone that she's trying to say liberalism have their own targets of religious worship, even if it is not really a "god". Maybe she's referring to environmentalism and the earth? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:I haven't read the book, but it seems from that sentence alone that she's trying to say liberalism have their own targets of religious worship, even if it is not really a "god". Maybe she's referring to environmentalism and the earth? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::But if it has a god, or multiple gods, it's by definition not atheistic. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:31, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::But if it has a god, or multiple gods, it's by definition not atheistic. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:31, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
1,106

edits