Changes

no edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:  
I don't think any amount of time will bring conservapedia to any sort of "general encyclopedia" status. There is simply too much information out there for the selected group of people that subscribe to conservapedia to catalog efficiently. The reason wikipedia is so thorough is because they have a larger population of people contributing. Conservapedia's viewpoints (and very severe and in some cases biased mods) generally turn off many people that could contribute a wealth of information. [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]] 12:18, 18 May
 
I don't think any amount of time will bring conservapedia to any sort of "general encyclopedia" status. There is simply too much information out there for the selected group of people that subscribe to conservapedia to catalog efficiently. The reason wikipedia is so thorough is because they have a larger population of people contributing. Conservapedia's viewpoints (and very severe and in some cases biased mods) generally turn off many people that could contribute a wealth of information. [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]] 12:18, 18 May
 
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
 
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates]]
 +
 +
If I can't get to the library I've been finding Google Scholar to be incredibly useful. --[[User:RobinGoodfellow|RobinGoodfellow]] 19:18, 8 July 2008 (EDT)