Changes

Line 214: Line 214:  
:::That's fair and entirely possible. Surely there's a multitude of causes for these differences. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 14:45, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 
:::That's fair and entirely possible. Surely there's a multitude of causes for these differences. [[User:Corry|Corry]] 14:45, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I suspect (and its only a suspicion) that Andy may be correct about the rate of liberal promiscuity being higher than that of conservatives.  However I think that liberals are better at teaching their children about safe sex and the use of condoms than conservatives are.--[[User:MCrowe|MCrowe]] 14:47, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I suspect (and its only a suspicion) that Andy may be correct about the rate of liberal promiscuity being higher than that of conservatives.  However I think that liberals are better at teaching their children about safe sex and the use of condoms than conservatives are.--[[User:MCrowe|MCrowe]] 14:47, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::I don't think the CDC data really adds anything to the debate, whilst as a Brit I will freely admit to not having a good working knowledge of US politics, as I understand it the Democrat/Republican (and hence liberal/conservative split) in most states is roughly 50:50.  As a result you cannot really gain any meaningful correlation between a red or blue state and its STD rates.
 +
 +
::::It would be very interesting to see if there is a correlation between different sex-ed policies and STD rates (and a suspect such a study has been done) --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 15:22, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
    
==Quick question==
 
==Quick question==
169

edits