Changes

no edit summary
Line 111: Line 111:  
:::If he was a "teen crush of the month" then he can't, ''by definition'' be a "no-name" -- enough people knew his name that he won a ''popularity contest''. Why don't we just say "lesser-known", since everyone's already agreed to that, and just let this drop so we can move on to the four other fact tags? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:::If he was a "teen crush of the month" then he can't, ''by definition'' be a "no-name" -- enough people knew his name that he won a ''popularity contest''. Why don't we just say "lesser-known", since everyone's already agreed to that, and just let this drop so we can move on to the four other fact tags? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::::Yes, this has been settled so I agree that we should drop it. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 13:11, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::::Yes, this has been settled so I agree that we should drop it. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 13:11, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Prolonged seclusion==
 +
 +
I don't know why there's a fact tag on this line. Doesn't the "romance" begin when they have to spend several months up in the mountains alone together? As far as I know, for that prolonged period they were secluded to just themselves and some sheep. No women. So what's the issue? -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 13:16, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
4,781

edits