Changes

no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
I'm not sure about CP's COI rules, but unless someone can give me a good reason why we should hide such information, I'm going to revert that edit. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:23, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
 
I'm not sure about CP's COI rules, but unless someone can give me a good reason why we should hide such information, I'm going to revert that edit. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:23, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:There have been cases of people using Conservapedia for advertising or self-promotion and that has generally been frowned upon. This is an encyclopedia not an advertising directory. As I wrote the original piece it is acceptable that the person in question (if it is really him) should be permitted to correct factual errors and I have corrected the errors in my original text. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:31, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:There have been cases of people using Conservapedia for advertising or self-promotion and that has generally been frowned upon. This is an encyclopedia not an advertising directory. As I wrote the original piece it is acceptable that the person in question (if it is really him) should be permitted to correct factual errors and I have corrected the errors in my original text. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:31, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::The Conservapedia commandments state you must cite authoratative sources.  To my knowledge, there are no authoratative sources indicating who is the owner of the blog in question. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,751

edits