Changes

no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
I'm not sure about CP's COI rules, but unless someone can give me a good reason why we should hide such information, I'm going to revert that edit. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:23, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
 
I'm not sure about CP's COI rules, but unless someone can give me a good reason why we should hide such information, I'm going to revert that edit. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:23, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:There have been cases of people using Conservapedia for advertising or self-promotion and that has generally been frowned upon. This is an encyclopedia not an advertising directory. As I wrote the original piece it is acceptable that the person in question (if it is really him) should be permitted to correct factual errors and I have corrected the errors in my original text. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:31, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:There have been cases of people using Conservapedia for advertising or self-promotion and that has generally been frowned upon. This is an encyclopedia not an advertising directory. As I wrote the original piece it is acceptable that the person in question (if it is really him) should be permitted to correct factual errors and I have corrected the errors in my original text. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:31, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
−
:::The Conservapedia commandments state you must cite authoratative sources.  To my knowledge, there are no authoratative sources indicating who is the owner of the blog in question. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
+
:::The Conservapedia commandments state you must cite authoratative sources.  To my knowledge, there are no authoratative sources indicating who is the owner of the blog in question. In addition, conservapedia states that material must be verifiable and true.  I don't see how you are going to verify who the blog owner is. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,733

edits