nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,302
edits
Changes
Talk:Life and Doctrine (view source)
Revision as of 23:31, October 31, 2008
, 23:31, October 31, 2008deletion?
:There have been cases of people using Conservapedia for advertising or self-promotion and that has generally been frowned upon. This is an encyclopedia not an advertising directory. As I wrote the original piece it is acceptable that the person in question (if it is really him) should be permitted to correct factual errors and I have corrected the errors in my original text. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:31, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
:There have been cases of people using Conservapedia for advertising or self-promotion and that has generally been frowned upon. This is an encyclopedia not an advertising directory. As I wrote the original piece it is acceptable that the person in question (if it is really him) should be permitted to correct factual errors and I have corrected the errors in my original text. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:31, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
:::The Conservapedia commandments state you must cite authoratative sources. To my knowledge, there are no authoratative sources indicating who is the owner of the blog in question. In addition, conservapedia states that material must be verifiable and true. I don't see how you are going to verify who the blog owner is. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
:::The Conservapedia commandments state you must cite authoratative sources. To my knowledge, there are no authoratative sources indicating who is the owner of the blog in question. In addition, conservapedia states that material must be verifiable and true. I don't see how you are going to verify who the blog owner is. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 18:12, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
::::Is there a particular reason why this article was deleted and recreated? I wrote the original article and have now been deprived of the kudos of creating it. :( [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 19:31, 31 October 2008 (EDT)