Changes

Talk:Axiom of Choice (view source)

Revision as of 01:09, November 28, 2008

505 bytes added , 01:09, November 28, 2008

AndyJM's block

Line 57: Line 57:

::::I'll look into this further but upon first glance agree with Foxtrot. Wikipedia, not here, is the place to pretend falsely that the Axiom of Choice cannot be questioned. It is questioned, it is disfavored, and it does sometimes yield absurd results. Further comments welcome here, and if anyone thinks someone was improperly blocked then let's look at ''all'' his edits here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:13, 27 November 2008 (EST)

:::::Nobody claimed anything like that in this case. However, AndyJM removed a claim that was apparently wrong, and he was blocked for it. And BRichtigen was blocked for not simply ignoring this issue once Foxtrot lost interest. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 19:24, 27 November 2008 (EST)

+

:::::: AndyJM repeatedly deleted insights from entries, without explaining his deletions. That can be highly destructive if allowed to continue. We can debate the validity of his deletions, but at first glance AndyJM appears to me to have been wrong. Certainly his style was inappropriate in failing to explain or discuss his deletions. His block can be undone if you disagree, but more discussion would be needed about his specific edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:09, 27 November 2008 (EST)

== Latest edit ==

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,551

edits