Automoderated users, edit
1,837
edits
Changes
→United States Department of Agriculture Terms: Reply.
You seem to be a kind of expert on these things, so I'd love to get some input from you.
You seem to be a kind of expert on these things, so I'd love to get some input from you.
--[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 10:19, 16 December 2008 (EST)
--[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 10:19, 16 December 2008 (EST)
:[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]], I'm afraid I don't know. There are quite a few examples of this type of thing, and I agree with you that the reader is better off with the original site, at least as things stand now. You did an excellent job of improving [[Ridge roughness]], but what a lot of work it would be to do all of them! And I'm always wary of an article written by someone who knows little or nothing about the subject at hand. (Not, of course, implying that this is the case with you, but it has often been the case with me in these situations.) [[Ridge roughness]] at least won't hurt anyone - it's the unsourced cut-and-paste medical articles that scare me. I've taken the liberty of adding quotations marks and a <nowiki>{{stub}}</nowiki> template to [[Ridge roughness]]. At least with a stub template it goes on the list of articles that need to be nurtured. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:41, 16 December 2008 (EST)